The recent conflict between Israel and Hamas in Gaza has sparked discussions about the challenges, technology, and choices involved in the ongoing conflict. The article highlights the significance of the recent atrocities committed by Hamas and the impact it has had on Israel's national trauma. It emphasizes the importance of not underestimating the enemy and the need for unity and vigilance in the face of external threats. The role of Hamas as a proxy for Iran, with support from Russia and China, is discussed, emphasizing the need for a change in the approach of Western politicians towards conflicts. The article calls for total economic isolation of offending countries.
The article also explores the Israeli dilemma of whether to continue the fight against Hamas, considering the potential costs and risks involved. It suggests that Israel has the capability to defeat Hamas and emphasizes the importance of long-term gains, such as gaining the respect and support of Arab participants in the Abraham Accords. The author acknowledges the challenges and questions whether Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has the determination to see the campaign through.
The article analyzes the intelligence failures in Israel and the United States, with the Israeli government and Prime Minister Netanyahu being held responsible for the lack of preparedness. It stresses the importance of being prepared for future attacks and advocates for increased efforts to join NATO. The effectiveness of Israel's Iron Dome and the Palestinians' ability to manufacture and launch rockets are also discussed. The article concludes by highlighting the need for Ukraine to be prepared for future attacks from Russia.
The article further discusses the challenges of using military means to defeat Hamas, including the difficulty of distinguishing between combatants and civilians and the ever-changing locations used by terrorists. It argues that a state waging war against a terrorist organization cannot win using military means alone. The article also mentions the election of Hamas and the need for a new leader in Israel to bring about a different dialogue.
The article delves into the technological aspects of the conflict, highlighting the October 7 attacks by Hamas on Israel as a carefully coordinated effort that caught Israel off guard. It speculates that Hamas may have used Huawei phones to evade communications being tapped into. Israel's intelligence agencies, known for their invincibility, are now being questioned for their delayed response and intelligence failures. China, which has a diplomatic relationship with Palestine, is believed to have provided technological support to Hamas. The use of Chinese technology may have been due to reasons other than support for the Palestinian cause. Hamas employed unconventional tactics to overcome Israel's high-tech security systems, including a cyber cleanup campaign and denial and deception schemes. The attacks revealed the need for better synergies between artificial intelligence and human guidance in intelligence gathering. Hamas demonstrated its ability to avoid detection by space-based sensors. The article raises questions about the loopholes in existing technical systems in the region.
The article "Opinion: Why Israel’s divide-and-rule approach towards Palestinians backfired so spectacularly" argues that Israel's divide-and-rule approach towards Palestinians has backfired and suggests that if Israel wants to weaken Hamas, it needs to rethink its attitude towards the Fatah-dominated Palestinian Authority (PA) and Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) in the West Bank. The author explains that by strengthening these Palestinian groups, Hamas and more extreme groups will be marginalized in the long run. The article traces Israel's history of using Hamas to split and cripple the Palestinian national movement, and how this strategy has led to the current situation. The author emphasizes the need for Israel to engage seriously and constructively with the PA and the PLO, rather than bolstering those who want to kill Israelis. They argue that a negotiated agreement with Palestinian factions is the only way to achieve lasting security for Israel.
The article "Opinion: Hamas-Israel conflict now a ‘disproportional’ war" discusses the ongoing conflict between Hamas and Israel, highlighting the disproportionate tactics used by Hamas. It mentions that Hamas carried out a premeditated attack targeting unarmed civilians in Israel, with the aim of blaming Israel's occupation and derailing the Abraham Accords. The article also mentions Hamas' use of rockets, the creation of a tunnel city for weapons and safe havens, and the strategic placement of headquarters under hospitals, mosques, and schools. It highlights Israel's efforts to warn civilians and avoid civilian casualties, while also emphasizing the challenges Israel faces in a hostile Middle East and a changing political landscape. The article concludes by stating that Israel cannot fully engage in a disproportionate war without risking its military resupply and a wider conflict with the Islamic world.
The article "The Limits on Technological Superiority" discusses Israel's reliance on technological superiority in its conflict with Hamas in the Gaza Strip. It highlights the limitations of technology in eliminating the 'fog of war' and countering simple measures like drones and explosive devices. The article emphasizes that while technology is important, full control of the territory and a substantial presence on the ground are necessary to win against terrorist organizations. Overreliance on technology can hinder the desired outcome in conflicts of this nature.
The article "Opinion: Israel is hypocritical in pointing out Hamas' use of unsustainable materials" discusses the hypocrisy of the Israeli government in criticizing Hamas for its use of unsustainable materials while engaging in actions that harm the environment. It highlights Israel's use of white phosphorous, which is illegal under international law and has severe environmental and health impacts. The destruction of olive trees, a significant aspect of Palestinian agriculture, is also mentioned, along with the concept of greenwashing. The article suggests that Israel's claims of sustainability are a facade, and its actions may be driven by a desire for access to fossil fuels. The author emphasizes the connection between the Israeli occupation and the climate crisis. The piece is written by Urooba Shaikh, a Climate Crisis Columnist for The Varsity.
The article "In pursuit of the last Hamas" discusses the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas in Gaza. It highlights the Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's determination to destroy Hamas and the consequences of such a pursuit. The article mentions South Africa's case against Israel at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and the rising death toll in Gaza. It also draws parallels with historical conflicts and the unintended consequences of pursuing the complete destruction of an enemy. The author emphasizes the need for the cycle of violence to stop and calls for international pressure on Netanyahu to end the war.
[2e1fcc9c]