In a recent analysis by Jeffrey A. Tucker published in Eurasia Review, the libertarian movement is described as having become marginal and ineffective, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. Tucker highlights Edward Snowden's call for a political movement focused on liberty, which underscores the need for a revival of libertarian principles [f68fbf9d].
Libertarianism, as it was redefined in 1955, has faced significant challenges due to increasing government overreach. The Libertarian Party's nomination of Chase Oliver for the 2024 presidential election is cited as a pivotal moment, as Oliver failed to effectively oppose lockdowns and vaccine mandates, which many libertarians view as violations of personal freedoms [f68fbf9d].
The closure of FreedomWorks is seen as a signal marking the end of what some refer to as the libertarian moment. Tucker argues that issues surrounding free trade and immigration have further strained libertarian orthodoxy, complicating the movement's ability to maintain a cohesive stance on these critical topics [f68fbf9d].
Moreover, the rise of Donald Trump and an increasing corporatism in politics have shifted loyalties away from traditional libertarian values. Tucker criticizes the professionalization of activism and organizational mismanagement within the libertarian movement, suggesting that these factors have contributed to its decline [f68fbf9d].
Despite these challenges, Tucker emphasizes that the aspiration for freedom remains alive, calling for a revival of libertarian principles grounded in truth and intellectual engagement. He posits that while the movement may be broken, the core ideals of liberty and individual rights continue to resonate with many [f68fbf9d].