Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal's fate lies in the hands of the future Chief Justice, according to an article published on ap7am.com [52c32dc5]. The article introduces the future Chief Justice without providing specific details about their identity. It highlights the significance of their role in determining the outcome of Kejriwal's case. However, the article does not mention the nature of the case or the grievances involved. The publication date of the article is May 11, 2024, at 09:53. The article emphasizes the connection between the future Chief Justice and Kejriwal's fate, but does not provide further information about the specific circumstances or details of the case [52c32dc5].
In a recent interview with Chief Justice Wagner, he discussed various topics related to the Canadian justice system. The interview, conducted by CTV News [537e4fe1], covered the role of the Chief Justice, the Supreme Court's response to the COVID-19 pandemic, and the challenges faced by the Canadian justice system. Chief Justice Wagner emphasized the importance of judicial independence and the need for diversity on the bench. He also addressed the issue of delays in the justice system and the efforts being made to address this issue. The interview provides valuable insights into the Chief Justice's perspective on key issues facing the Canadian justice system [537e4fe1].
Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud stated that judges reflect a sense of continuity of constitutional values that protect the system. He highlighted the role of technology in injecting greater transparency into the judicial system. The judiciary has a vital role to play in reflecting tradition and the future of a good society. Chief Justice Chandrachud stated that he has never faced political pressure in his 24 years as a judge, but judges must understand the impact of their decisions on the polity at large [563668fd].
Justice K V Viswanathan, a judge of the Supreme Court of India, spoke about the impact of disinformation on the rule of law and its emergence as the most severe global risk. He discussed the regulation of disinformation in the digital era and the effects it has on society, such as polarizing opinions and forming actions based on false information. Justice Viswanathan also highlighted other emerging areas of law, including climate change, artificial intelligence, and data protection and privacy. He mentioned the increasing number of climate change litigations globally and the need to understand the legal dimensions of climate change. Regarding disinformation, he emphasized the challenge of regulating it without compromising freedom of speech and expression. He referred to the German and Singaporean models of regulating disinformation and suggested the use of "harmony speech" as an alternative to suppressing free speech. Justice Viswanathan also discussed the role of artificial intelligence in the legal system, stating that it can be responsibly employed to improve efficiency and access to justice. He mentioned AI tools used in predicting judges' questions, filtering cases, and translating judgments. Additionally, he addressed the importance of data protection and privacy laws, including issues of information privacy and targeted advertisements. Justice Viswanathan concluded by urging conscious action to address these emerging issues that impact the law and legal systems. [c59a62ff].
An article published on Legal Service India explores the importance of judicial independence in ensuring democracy and the rule of law [efcab737]. The article cites Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud's views on the subject, emphasizing the need for both institutional autonomy and judges' freedom from external pressures. It discusses historical and contemporary challenges to judicial independence, including governmental interference and public opinion. The article also highlights constitutional safeguards and factors contributing to its erosion, such as post-retirement appointments and legislative actions [efcab737].
Yaw Buaben Asamoa, spokesperson of independent presidential aspirant, Alan Kyerematen, believes that the number of Supreme Court justices should not be capped. He argues that efforts should be made to strengthen the administrative aspect of justice delivery, including having a well-resourced research desk and technical and legal team. He emphasizes that investing in the administration of justice at all levels, not just the Supreme Court, is crucial. Saviour Kudzoe, the Public Relations Officer of the Ghana Bar Association, also calls for a broad-based consultation on the appointment of justices of the Supreme Court. He suggests engaging Parliament and the Council of State in the appointment process. Attorney-General Godfred Dame supports the expansion of the Supreme Court, citing the substantial increase in the backlog of cases as justification. He states that appointing more justices would ensure speedy and effective justice and contribute to the efficient administration of the Supreme Court. Some lawyers and analysts, including Martin Kpebu, express concerns about the timing and procedure for the appointments, emphasizing the need for a recommendation from the Judicial Council before the president can proceed with the appointment process. Kpebu clarifies that the concerns are not about the competence of the nominees. Overall, the article highlights the importance of investing in the administration of justice delivery and engaging in a broad-based consultation for the appointment of Supreme Court justices in Ghana [58f6bb6d].
According to an article published on 3news.com, Saviour Kudzoe, the Public Relations Officer of the Ghana Bar Association, has called for a broad-based consultation on the appointment of justices of the Supreme Court in Ghana. He suggests engaging Parliament and the Council of State in the appointment process. Kudzoe notes that the Supreme Court is overwhelmed with cases due to increased awareness of people's rights, and therefore, increasing the number of justices is necessary. Attorney-General Godfred Dame also supports the expansion of the Supreme Court, stating that it would ensure speedy and effective justice and minimize delays. However, lawyer Martin Kpebu raises concerns about the timing and procedure for the appointments, emphasizing the need for a recommendation from the Judicial Council before the president can proceed with the appointment process [adeeffef].
Federal Court Chief Justice Debbie Mortimer has criticized plans to include judicial pensions in a tax overhaul of large superannuation accounts, stating it could harm the integrity of the court and its ability to attract top candidates. The chief justice expressed concerns about the proposed Division 296 tax and its impact on judicial pensions [e862751a].
The article 'Rule by judges is not rule of law' by Chidi Anselm Odinkalu raises concerns about the legitimacy of judges' decisions in Nigeria's legal system. The article mentions the recent Supreme Court judgment on local government elections and the ECOWAS Court of Justice's ruling on the #EndSARS protests. It also highlights the appointment of new justices to the Court of Appeal and the FCT High Court, noting the presence of political influence and nepotism in the process. The author criticizes the lack of accountability and integrity in the judicial appointments process and the perception of corruption within the judiciary. The article argues that the concentration of power in the hands of judges and the erosion of public trust in the judiciary have undermined the rule of law [05fe311e].
R. Venkataramani, Attorney General of India, called for the establishment of a national institution to mainstream and integrate law, economics, policy, and judicial administration. He made this statement at the book launch of 'Supreme Court and the Indian Economy', which examines the impact of the Supreme Court's decisions on economic policy issues. The book was released at an event organized by CUTS International, SILF, and CIRC. Venkataramani emphasized the need for a better understanding of the interstice of law and economics and highlighted the principle of 'Equal Regard & Equal Reward' for all courts. The book analyzes landmark cases where judicial rulings have had economic implications and explores the complex relationship between judicial decisions and economic policy. Panellists at the event praised the Indian Judiciary, and it was recommended that lawyers and judges read the book to improve their adjudication. A second volume of case studies involving the Supreme Court and the National Green Tribunal is also in progress. [c298cadb]