In a world that is experiencing a messy and transitional moment, the need for comprehensive statecraft has become increasingly apparent. Anthony Bubalo, in an article for The Australian Financial Review, argues that democratic states must employ a whole-of-nation approach to compete with China and other states challenging the status quo [87c5ec23]. Bubalo highlights the growing risks of conflict and the erosion of trust between states, emphasizing the need for effective policymaking and international cooperation to address challenges such as climate change and AI. He also points out the opportunities for prosperity, such as the energy transition and AI-led industrial revolution [87c5ec23].
To address these complex geopolitical dynamics, Bubalo suggests that a more comprehensive approach is required, going beyond traditional processes and levers. The Australian government has embraced this idea and is calling for whole-of-nation defense and close cooperation between government and business. Bubalo proposes the establishment of a "diplomacy lab" that would bring together government and non-government expertise, perspectives, and resources to develop and implement major foreign policy initiatives. This approach would allow officials to focus on proactive initiatives, explore riskier ideas, and integrate a wider range of expertise and perspectives [87c5ec23].
Bubalo's argument adds to the ongoing discussion about the shifting global order and the need for countries to adapt their foreign policy strategies. It underscores the importance of comprehensive statecraft in navigating the complexities of the current geopolitical landscape. By harnessing the collective wisdom and creativity of all parts of the nation, both inside and outside of government, countries can better address the challenges and opportunities presented by the changing global order [87c5ec23].
India, too, recognizes the importance of comprehensive statecraft in shaping its future. Gautam Chikermane, in an article for Observer Research Foundation, argues that India needs to articulate a grand strategy that builds on its ancient statecraft principles of peace, prosperity, and the planet [12b6bdb7]. Chikermane suggests that India should reformulate its Cabinet Committee on Security as the Cabinet Committee on Grand Strategy and actively involve the research community in this field. He emphasizes the need for India to clearly articulate its highest national goals, procure the necessary instruments, and acquire the resources to achieve those goals. Chikermane proposes that India's grand strategy should be a whole-of-state approach, rooted in its cultural moorings and philosophical values, and focused on security, economy, technology, and resources. He also highlights the importance of proactive engagement with other countries while managing tensions, countering narratives and disinformation, and involving the private sector as a strategic partner [12b6bdb7].
The call for comprehensive statecraft and the articulation of a grand strategy reflect the evolving nature of the global order and the need for countries to adapt their approaches to address the challenges and opportunities of the 21st century. Both Bubalo and Chikermane emphasize the importance of proactive and holistic approaches that go beyond traditional methods, engage a wide range of expertise and perspectives, and foster international cooperation. These ideas provide valuable insights for policymakers and decision-makers as they navigate the complexities of the current geopolitical landscape and shape their countries' future trajectories [87c5ec23], [12b6bdb7].
