In February 2021, President Joe Biden announced that the Section 232 tariff on imported aluminum would continue, despite lifting tariffs on other imports. The decision was made to support the domestic aluminum industry, which was considered essential for national defense. However, a report by the Congressional Research Office revealed that there was a 9% reduction in U.S. aluminum industry jobs from 2019 to 2020, partly due to higher production costs and competition from cheaper foreign imports. The U.S. price of primary aluminum has been 15% higher than the world price, making the industry noncompetitive [2e4826f1].
The higher cost of domestic aluminum has also had a negative impact on the agriculture industry, as it is used in farm machinery and equipment, making them more expensive for farmers. This has affected the profitability of farmers and added to the financial burden they face. Additionally, retaliatory tariffs imposed by other countries on U.S. agricultural exports have resulted in significant losses for farmers. The World Trade Organization recently ruled that the U.S. violated international trading rules by imposing tariffs on steel and aluminum imports [2e4826f1].
Farmers argue that while national security is important, the negative impact of the aluminum tariff on the agriculture industry should be considered, and the tariff should be removed. They believe that the tariff has increased input costs and made farm equipment more expensive, further impacting the agriculture industry. Farmers and agricultural lobbyists are calling for the removal of the aluminum tariff to alleviate the financial burden on farmers and support the sustainability of the agriculture industry [2e4826f1].
The Section 232 tariffs on imports of steel and aluminum have had a detrimental impact on the economy. The tariffs raised the cost of production for manufacturers, reducing employment in those industries and raising prices for consumers. A report from the U.S. International Trade Commission found that the tariffs increased the average prices of steel and aluminum by 2.4% and 1.6% respectively, disproportionately hurting downstream industries that use steel and aluminum in their production processes. The tariffs on steel and aluminum have negatively affected American industries and consumers, with downstream industries experiencing an annual $3.4 billion loss in production from 2018 to 2021. Repealing the steel and aluminum tariffs and quotas would boost long-run GDP by 0.02% and create more than 4,000 jobs. Other estimates suggest the job losses from steel and aluminum tariffs were as high as 75,000 [ad172ca1].
Adding to these concerns, former Congressman Charlie Dent emphasized that free trade is crucial for American agriculture, which heavily relies on foreign markets. He warned that unilateral tariffs could jeopardize U.S. agricultural trade, recalling the historical failure of protectionist policies like the Smoot-Hawley Tariff, which led to a significant decline in global trade. Dent noted that tariffs act as taxes on importers, ultimately increasing costs for consumers and harming the economy [c8e0ff38].
The detrimental impact of the aluminum tariffs on farmers and the agriculture industry highlights the need for a comprehensive review of trade policies. While national security is important, the negative consequences on other industries and the overall economy should be carefully considered. The removal of the aluminum tariff would alleviate the financial burden on farmers and support the sustainability of the agriculture industry, while the repeal of the steel and aluminum tariffs would have positive effects on the economy as a whole [2e4826f1] [ad172ca1].