Female voters' concerns beyond abortion in 2024 election

Version 0.35 (2024-09-28 16:37:41.443000)

updates: Expanded focus on female voters' diverse issues

➔
➔
➔
➔
➔

Version 0.34 (2024-09-22 15:33:36.219000)

updates: Incorporated young voters' issues and sentiments.

➔
➔
➔
➔

Version 0.33 (2024-09-22 14:44:28.683000)

updates: Integration of young voters' issues and concerns

➔
➔
➔

Version 0.32 (2024-09-16 12:41:35.530000)

updates: Shift in voter sentiment towards Kamala Harris

➔
➔

Version 0.31 (2024-09-14 19:38:21.053000)

updates: Increased voter skepticism towards Biden-Harris administration

➔

Version 0.3 (2024-09-06 03:28:24.389000)

updates: Added perspective on youth and democracy

➔
➔
➔
➔

Version 0.29 (2024-08-10 23:00:07.105000)

updates: New information on the mental health impact of the 2024 election

➔
➔
➔
➔

Version 0.28 (2024-07-28 17:07:21.619000)

updates: Integration of information on election-related anxiety and its impact on mental health

➔
➔
➔

Version 0.27 (2024-07-13 14:58:42.720000)

updates: Gen Z voters' frustration with political parties and the future of democracy

➔
➔

Version 0.26 (2024-06-27 10:58:56.582000)

updates: The opinion piece highlights what Gen Z voters want to hear from Donald Trump

➔
➔
➔

Version 0.25 (2024-06-23 16:54:06.794000)

updates: New information about young voters' concerns and priorities

➔
➔
➔

Version 0.24 (2024-06-23 14:58:29.837000)

updates: The new generation gap among young voters

➔
➔

Version 0.23 (2024-06-22 07:53:16.229000)

updates: Incorporated opinion piece expressing dissatisfaction with the current candidates

➔
➔

Version 0.22 (2024-06-16 07:55:58.819000)

updates: The ranks of the double-haters — voters who say they don’t like either major party presidential candidate — are at a historic high and make up one-quarter of the electorate, according to a new analysis from Pew Research Centre. Double-haters were a key factor in Trump’s upset win in 2016, when they broke for the Republican candidate over Democrat Hillary Clinton. Biden and Trump are taking roughly equal measures of these disillusioned voters in battleground states, with Biden winning 25 per cent to Trump’s 22 per cent, a May Bloomberg News/Morning Consult poll shows. The biggest threat to Biden and Trump is that voters turned off by them will simply stay home — or find refuge in an independent candidate like Robert F. Kennedy Jnr, who is polling at 24 per cent among those voters in the Bloomberg/Morning Consult survey. Other third-party candidates are taking a combined 12 per cent. Growing political polarisation is driving the unpopularity. The Pew analysis found that presidential candidates are only slightly less popular within their own party than they were three decades ago, but that voters of the opposing party are much more negative.

➔

Version 0.21 (2024-06-15 12:55:36.599000)

updates: The impact of voter engagement on the 2024 election

➔

Version 0.2 (2024-06-11 15:53:02.552000)

updates: The inclusion of the impact of cynicism among young American voters on the 2024 election

➔

Version 0.19 (2024-04-07 15:19:57.376000)

updates: Georgia activist recruiting infrequent voters

➔

Version 0.18 (2024-03-06 02:19:28.788000)

updates: Explores the exhaustion and disengagement of Americans in the 2024 election

➔

Version 0.17 (2024-03-05 13:17:33.030000)

updates: The article from EFG Companies highlights that the presidential election is not expected to have a notable impact on the economy at large, but control of the White House and Congress could guide policies impacting various sectors. [aa2273fe]

➔
➔

Version 0.16 (2024-03-04 12:25:21.242000)

updates: The article from FXStreet discusses the fiscal policy implications of the 2024 US elections, including the reinstatement of the debt ceiling, the expiration of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, and the potential impact of tax policy changes. It also highlights the uncertainty surrounding the impact of tax policy changes that may or may not take effect in 2026. The article emphasizes that serious long-run fiscal challenges are likely to remain regardless of the election outcome. [9cd6872f]

➔

Version 0.15 (2024-02-28 11:17:52.133000)

updates: The impact of Trump and Biden's industrial and trade policies on nonunion workers

➔

Version 0.14 (2024-02-26 14:23:51.872000)

updates: Integration of analysis on the potential impact of a Trump win in the 2024 election on the bond market and economic dynamics

➔

Version 0.13 (2024-02-20 04:19:37.295000)

updates: None

➔

Version 0.12 (2024-02-19 22:16:40.499000)

updates: Analysis of the economic policies of the 2024 election candidates

➔
➔
➔
➔
➔
➔
➔
➔
➔

Version 0.11 (2024-02-12 18:28:05.064000)

updates: Analysis of how the U.S. election results could impact financial markets

➔
➔
➔
➔
➔
➔
➔
➔

Version 0.1 (2024-02-06 15:12:52.964000)

updates: The impact of the U.S. and Mexican elections on investment markets

➔
➔
➔
➔
➔
➔
➔
➔

Version 0.09 (2024-01-31 15:27:36.243000)

updates: The article from OMFIF discusses the economic, political, and institutional resilience of the U.S. in the upcoming election.

➔
➔
➔
➔
➔
➔
➔
➔

Version 0.08 (2024-01-12 19:18:03.549000)

updates: Added information about the impact of the U.S. and Mexican elections on Mexico's economy

➔
➔
➔
➔
➔
➔
➔

Version 0.07 (2023-12-19 16:59:17.141000)

updates: Integrates information from The Washington Post article

➔
➔
➔
➔
➔
➔

Version 0.06 (2023-11-30 19:38:57.474000)

updates: Incorporated information about the impact of incumbency advantage and economic metrics on the election outcome

➔
➔
➔
➔
➔

Version 0.05 (2023-11-20 23:00:02.246000)

updates: Incorporated information about the relationship between economic indicators and election outcomes

➔
➔
➔
➔

Version 0.04 (2023-11-17 16:04:39.942000)

updates: Added information about the Federal Reserve's role in the election

➔
➔
➔
➔

Version 0.03 (2023-11-17 15:03:55.455000)