[Tree] Lazada's competitive strategies in Southeast Asian e-commerce
Version 1.11 (2024-09-14 01:39:36.933000)
updates: Lazada emphasizes AI and logistics against Temu competition
- ➔
Version 1.1 (2024-08-28 07:37:54.931000)
updates: SenseTime's revenue growth, financial losses, and AI chatbot launch
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 1.09 (2024-07-15 02:53:24.381000)
updates: Lotte Department Store implements AI across internal operations
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 1.08 (2024-06-28 13:21:30.642000)
updates: Xiao-I Corporation partners with a leading telecommunications provider to revolutionize customer service with AI chatbot solution
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 1.07 (2024-06-28 13:18:13.165000)
updates: Xiao-I Corporation partners with leading telecommunications provider to deploy AI Chatbot solution
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 1.06 (2024-05-30 04:21:39.651000)
updates: SenseTime's shares increase after the launch of SenseChat in Hong Kong
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 1.04 (2024-05-30 04:07:43.497000)
updates: SenseTime releases Cantonese AI chatbot, plans to expand into Southeast Asian markets
- ➔
Version 1.03 (2024-05-27 19:12:37.108000)
updates: Chinese woman falls in love with AI chatbot, sparks internet support
- ➔
Version 1.02 (2024-05-25 09:28:40.422000)
updates: New information about China's ideologically aligned chatbot
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 1.01 (2024-05-24 16:23:05.716000)
updates: Integration of information about China's AI chatbot trained on President Xi Jinping's political ideology
- ➔
- ➔
Version 1.0 (2024-05-23 08:22:27.653000)
updates: Integration of OpenAI's challenges with Chinese training data
- ➔
Version 0.99 (2024-05-22 14:10:13.276000)
updates: China's new AI model trained on President Xi Jinping's philosophy
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.98 (2024-05-21 09:55:21.679000)
updates: Chinese state media's use of AI and 'guerrilla influencers' in propaganda
- ➔
Version 0.97 (2024-05-11 14:56:35.658000)
updates: Integration of AI in celebrity news journalism
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.96 (2024-05-08 02:14:34.778000)
updates: Chinese media's perspective on AI, critique, everyday life, influence
- ➔
Version 0.95 (2024-04-30 20:57:46.746000)
updates: Mainstream media adopts Dubformer AI for localisation cost reduction
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.94 (2024-04-30 20:42:04.086000)
updates: Australians express distrust in AI-generated news content
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.93 (2024-04-29 05:01:00.617000)
updates: Australians express distrust in AI-generated news content
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.92 (2024-04-27 11:56:50.461000)
updates: Integration of information about AI in literary publishing
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.91 (2024-04-20 11:24:48.158000)
updates: Includes details on the ethical challenges and collaborative efforts in AI journalism
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.9 (2024-04-20 11:23:54.973000)
updates: The article discusses the impact of AI on various industries and job sectors. It emphasizes the need for companies to invest in upskilling their workforce and prioritize diversity and inclusion. The article also highlights the ethical considerations in AI development and the transformative impact of AI on industries, jobs, and society as a whole.
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.89 (2024-04-20 11:15:07.801000)
updates: The article highlights the increasing role of AI in news gathering and production, the decreasing cost of generative AI, and the need for news organizations to adapt to AI. It also mentions the ethical and editorial challenges faced by journalists due to AI, the collaboration between media and tech organizations to set common standards, and the tough choices the journalism industry faces in dealing with AI.
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.88 (2024-04-20 09:20:53.827000)
updates: Integrates the ethical implications of AI for Muslims
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.87 (2024-04-20 06:20:10.166000)
updates: The rise of AI in journalism and its impact on journalists' choices
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.86 (2024-04-19 22:50:06.284000)
updates: The clothing industry's exploration of AI-generated models and the concerns about job displacement
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.85 (2024-04-19 08:19:24.640000)
updates: Integration of information on the risks of AI, job displacement, and economic inequality
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.84 (2024-04-17 20:21:38.638000)
updates: Added information about the impact of AI on different types of jobs and the potential consequences for women and young people
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.83 (2024-04-17 20:02:13.648000)
updates: The story now includes information on the impact of AI on job security and the potential replacement of workers with AI technology
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.82 (2024-04-11 19:18:54.391000)
updates: Integration of gig economy trend in AI training
- ➔
Version 0.81 (2024-04-10 06:20:48.544000)
updates: Integration of AI and machine learning in Africa
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.8 (2024-04-09 07:20:41.757000)
updates: The Financial Express report on the major changes AI will bring in 2024
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.79 (2024-04-03 10:36:33.797000)
updates: CeADAR predicts businesses prioritizing full automation and AI products
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.78 (2024-03-31 06:49:44.998000)
updates: The new information provides more details on the report sponsored by Microsoft Ireland and Trinity College Dublin’s Business School, including the prevalence of generative AI in different sectors and the risks of employees using generative AI tools without organizational consent. It also highlights the launch of Skill Up Ireland, a national AI skilling program, and emphasizes the potential benefits of embracing generative AI. The new information reinforces the idea that Irish organizations have a unique opportunity to lead in generative AI adoption.
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.77 (2024-03-31 06:48:36.862000)
updates: Integrating generative AI in Irish organizations, concerns about unauthorized use of AI tools, Microsoft Ireland's Skill Up Ireland program
- ➔
Version 0.76 (2024-03-31 06:45:53.703000)
updates: Data privacy concerns of Azure OpenAI and Copilot
- ➔
Version 0.75 (2024-03-29 18:37:13.801000)
updates: Microsoft introduces security and anti-hallucination features for Azure AI
- ➔
Version 0.74 (2024-03-29 12:50:25.733000)
updates: Microsoft is developing safety features for AI chatbots
- ➔
Version 0.73 (2024-03-29 12:49:32.816000)
updates: Microsoft develops safety features for AI chatbots
- ➔
Version 0.72 (2024-03-28 16:37:30.899000)
updates: Updates on Indian IT sector, US government safeguards, and Microsoft's data protection commitment
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.71 (2024-03-28 16:16:50.097000)
updates: Microsoft emphasizes data protection for AI products and solutions
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.71 (2024-03-28 16:16:50.097000)
updates: Microsoft emphasizes data protection for AI products and solutions
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.7 (2024-03-28 09:22:29.816000)
updates: The US government issues a directive requiring AI safeguards for federal agencies
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.69 (2024-03-27 12:06:46.616000)
updates: United Nations resolution on trustworthy AI
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.68 (2024-03-26 21:24:35.195000)
updates: APRU's AI for Social Good Initiative in Bangladesh and Thailand Highlights the Transformation of Social Policies and Services
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.67 (2024-03-26 19:03:55.848000)
updates: Inclusion of APRU's AI for Social Good initiative in Bangladesh and Thailand
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.66 (2024-03-26 09:15:41.962000)
updates: Vietnam co-sponsors UN's first AI resolution
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.64 (2024-03-25 05:03:30.015000)
updates: UNGA adopts first global resolution on AI, EU passes AI Act
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.63 (2024-03-25 04:52:47.495000)
updates: UNGA adopts resolution promoting safe and secure AI systems for sustainable development
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.61 (2024-03-22 20:36:02.382000)
updates: India's participation in the Global Alliance for Ethical Innovation, UNGA's adoption of the first global resolution on AI, Western New York's support for Empire AI
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.6 (2024-03-22 20:31:37.866000)
updates: The United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) has unanimously adopted the first global resolution on AI to protect personal data, monitor AI for risks, and safeguard human rights. Western New York elected officials, UB leadership, and tech leaders have expressed their support for Empire AI, a first-in-the-nation initiative that aims to position New York as a national leader in responsible artificial intelligence (AI) innovation.
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.59 (2024-03-22 20:21:28.335000)
updates: The Western New York region supports Empire AI initiative
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.57 (2024-03-22 17:46:42.506000)
updates: India joins the Global Alliance for Ethical Innovation
- ➔
Version 0.55 (2024-03-22 17:21:54.433000)
updates: The resolution is the result of three months of negotiations. It is a non-binding document. The resolution recognizes the potential of AI systems to accelerate progress towards the 17 Sustainable Development Goals and calls on all member states and stakeholders to refrain from using AI systems that violate international human rights law or pose undue risks to human rights. The resolution highlights the importance of cooperation to close the digital divide and increase digital literacy. The resolution is seen as a foundation for global AI development and application, aligning with efforts to ensure AI benefits society and manages risks appropriately. The resolution also emphasizes the importance of socially responsible AI design, development, deployment, and use to safeguard human rights and freedoms. The resolution took nearly four months to negotiate and provides a baseline set of principles to guide AI's development and use. China and Russia, like other governments, are exploring the use of AI tools. Last month, Microsoft reported that hackers from both countries were using Microsoft-backed OpenAI software for espionage purposes. The resolution is seen as a comprehensive vision for international cooperation on AI, emphasizing equitable access and the management of AI risks. It highlights the importance of fostering secure and reliable AI systems that adhere to international human rights standards and mitigate potential risks to human rights. The UNGA called upon all stakeholders to develop regulatory frameworks and governance approaches for the safe and secure use of AI. The Assembly also highlighted the importance of supporting developing nations in bridging the digital divide and enhancing digital literacy. The European Parliament has recently passed regulations under the Artificial Intelligence Act to balance innovation with safeguarding citizens against potential risks.
- ➔
Version 0.54 (2024-03-22 08:00:40.772000)
updates: Adoption of the first global resolution on AI
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.53 (2024-03-22 07:59:34.911000)
updates: The resolution emphasizes the importance of fostering secure and reliable AI systems that adhere to international human rights standards and mitigate potential risks to human rights. The UNGA called upon all stakeholders to develop regulatory frameworks and governance approaches for the safe and secure use of AI. The Assembly also highlighted the importance of supporting developing nations in bridging the digital divide and enhancing digital literacy.
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.52 (2024-03-22 07:55:57.302000)
updates: Resolution details on safeguarding human rights and privacy
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.51 (2024-03-22 07:54:59.904000)
updates: Resolution negotiation process and additional details on AI safeguards and human rights
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.5 (2024-03-22 04:49:58.463000)
updates: The new information provides more details about the resolution, including its emphasis on human rights and the recognition of AI's potential to accelerate progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals. It also highlights the call for refraining from using AI systems that violate human rights and the need for regulatory and governance approaches for the safe and trustworthy use of AI. The information also mentions the introduction of the resolution by the US Ambassador to the UN and its intention to complement future UN initiatives on AI. The new information adds depth and context to the story, providing a more comprehensive understanding of the resolution and its significance.
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.49 (2024-03-22 04:47:45.269000)
updates: Resolution also addresses human rights protection and monitoring AI for risks
- ➔
Version 0.47 (2024-03-22 04:41:30.421000)
updates: The United Nations General Assembly unanimously adopted the first global resolution on AI titled 'Seizing the opportunities of safe, secure and trustworthy artificial intelligence systems for sustainable development.' The resolution aims to protect personal data, enhance privacy policies, monitor AI for potential risks, and uphold human rights. It was proposed by the United States and received support from China and 121 other countries. The resolution is nonbinding but is seen as a critical step towards establishing international guidelines for the ethical and sustainable development of AI. The initiative is a response to concerns about the potential dangers of AI, including its impact on democratic processes, fraudulent activities, job displacement, and human rights. The resolution was reached after three months of negotiation and is the first-ever truly global consensus document on AI. It joins other international efforts to influence the trajectory of AI development. The UN agreement follows the Bletchley Declaration signed by 28 nations attending the UK's first AI Summit. Europe is also working on comprehensive AI regulations, while the US government is still lacking consensus on legislative action related to AI regulation. The resolution recognizes the rapid acceleration of AI development and emphasizes the urgency of achieving global consensus on safe AI systems. It also calls for the closure of the digital divide between developed and developing countries and the inclusion of developing countries in discussions on AI. The resolution encourages the development of regulatory and governance approaches for safe AI systems and warns against improper or malicious use of AI systems. It aims to use AI to help achieve the United Nations' development goals for 2030. The resolution is not legally binding but reflects global opinion on AI regulation.
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.46 (2024-03-22 04:34:55.594000)
updates: The United Nations General Assembly unanimously adopted the first global resolution on AI titled 'Seizing the opportunities of safe, secure and trustworthy artificial intelligence systems for sustainable development.' The resolution aims to protect personal data, enhance privacy policies, monitor AI for potential risks, and uphold human rights. It was proposed by the United States and received support from China and 121 other countries. The resolution is nonbinding but is seen as a critical step towards establishing international guidelines for the ethical and sustainable development of AI. The initiative is a response to concerns about the potential dangers of AI, including its impact on democratic processes, fraudulent activities, job displacement, and human rights. The resolution was reached after three months of negotiation and is the first-ever truly global consensus document on AI. It joins other international efforts to influence the trajectory of AI development. The UN agreement follows the Bletchley Declaration signed by 28 nations attending the UK's first AI Summit. Europe is also working on comprehensive AI regulations, while the US government is still lacking consensus on legislative action related to AI regulation.
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.45 (2024-03-22 02:47:49.816000)
updates: The United Nations General Assembly unanimously adopts the first global resolution on AI
- ➔
Version 0.44 (2024-03-21 16:25:29.356000)
updates: The United States is spearheading a United Nations resolution on artificial intelligence (AI), the international organization's first on the technology. The resolution, sponsored by the US and co-sponsored by more than 50 other countries, aims to promote safe and trustworthy AI systems and advance a shared approach to AI. It seeks to close the digital divide between richer and poorer countries and ensure all nations are involved in shaping global governance of AI. The resolution is not binding on member states but highlights a broad agreement on principles and future directions. The US hopes it will pass with the support of all member states and become the first-ever standalone effort at the UN to establish global consensus on AI. However, the resolution does not address some contentious areas of AI governance, leaving crucial matters on the table. The US has been keen to assert itself as a global AI leader to counter China's rising influence in the field. While the US is leading global AI governance efforts, comprehensive federal regulation of AI at home has not yet materialized. The resolution emphasizes the potential benefits of AI in meeting the UN's development goals for 2030, particularly in addressing poverty elimination, global health, food security, climate, energy, and education. The US began negotiating the AI resolution with UN member nations three months ago and has spent hundreds of hours in direct talks with individual nations.
- ➔
Version 0.43 (2024-03-21 13:47:26.925000)
updates: The United States is spearheading a United Nations resolution on artificial intelligence (AI), the international organization's first on the technology. The resolution, sponsored by the US and co-sponsored by more than 50 other countries, aims to promote safe and trustworthy AI systems and advance a shared approach to AI. It seeks to close the digital divide between richer and poorer countries and ensure all nations are involved in shaping global governance of AI. The resolution is not binding on member states but highlights a broad agreement on principles and future directions. The US hopes it will pass with the support of all member states and become the first-ever standalone effort at the UN to establish global consensus on AI. However, the resolution does not address some contentious areas of AI governance, leaving crucial matters on the table. The US has been keen to assert itself as a global AI leader to counter China's rising influence in the field. While the US is leading global AI governance efforts, comprehensive federal regulation of AI at home has not yet materialized. The resolution emphasizes the potential benefits of AI in meeting the UN's development goals for 2030, particularly in addressing poverty elimination, global health, food security, climate, energy, and education. The US began negotiating the AI resolution with UN member nations three months ago and has spent hundreds of hours in direct talks with individual nations.
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.42 (2024-03-21 05:57:02.307000)
updates: UN General Assembly to vote on resolution ensuring AI safety
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.41 (2024-03-21 03:21:51.288000)
updates: The UN General Assembly will address AI and weigh a resolution emphasizing the need for guidelines to promote safe and trustworthy AI systems. The resolution focuses on bridging the AI and digital divides and excludes military AI. UN Secretary-General calls for a UN entity for AI regulation. [4bf9159b]
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.4 (2024-03-18 22:17:52.852000)
updates: The US State Department will hold a meeting on responsible military use of AI
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.39 (2024-03-17 18:56:43.581000)
updates: US State Department to hold meeting on military use of AI
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.38 (2024-03-16 07:20:33.012000)
updates: India supports UN resolution on secure and trustworthy AI
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.37 (2024-03-15 01:48:15.670000)
updates: India's support for UN resolution on AI
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.36 (2024-03-14 23:27:55.929000)
updates: Integration of information about the international dialogue on AI safety
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.35 (2024-03-13 19:07:14.888000)
updates: New report published on the dangers of AI and concerns about Congress' ability to regulate AI
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.34 (2024-03-13 19:03:13.005000)
updates: Senate Chairman expresses concerns about Congress' ability to regulate AI
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.33 (2024-03-13 18:56:43.970000)
updates: Includes additional details from a report commissioned by the US State Department
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.32 (2024-03-12 19:17:36.448000)
updates: Report warns of 'extinction-level' threat from AI and calls for US intervention
- ➔
Version 0.31 (2024-03-12 09:18:09.335000)
updates: Government's AI advisory and its potential for manipulation
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.3 (2024-03-12 09:09:11.572000)
updates: Discusses the potential of AI, its impact on elections, environmental concerns, AI-generated fake news, combating AI-generated misinformation, and the fear of AI
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.29 (2024-03-11 18:18:15.196000)
updates: The article challenges the fear of AI and emphasizes the importance of R&D and STEM education
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.28 (2024-03-11 18:00:02.741000)
updates: Information about the challenges of detecting deepfakes and the need for source criticism and awareness has been added
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.27 (2024-03-11 17:58:13.797000)
updates: The article highlights the challenges of detecting deepfakes and the ongoing arms race between AI models that generate deepfakes and those that detect them.
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.26 (2024-03-11 16:23:06.895000)
updates: Discussion on strategies to combat AI-generated misinformation in elections
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.25 (2024-03-11 04:06:05.805000)
updates: New information about the proliferation of AI-generated fake news on 'news' sites
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.24 (2024-03-11 02:25:46.458000)
updates: Inclusion of information about the proliferation of AI-generated fake news
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.23 (2024-03-09 20:21:04.450000)
updates: Integrates information about the rising energy consumption of AI and its environmental impact
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.22 (2024-03-08 12:49:51.850000)
updates: The article highlights concerns about AI's potential impact on energy and water consumption
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.21 (2024-03-08 12:31:17.793000)
updates: Integration of new information about the potential impact of AI on climate change
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.2 (2024-03-08 12:24:29.651000)
updates: Discussion on the impact of AI-generated deepfake content on elections and the need for human intelligence to mitigate the harmful effects of AI
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.19 (2024-03-07 21:50:00.307000)
updates: The article highlights the need for regulation of AI in Kenya
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.18 (2024-03-07 21:40:26.279000)
updates: Discussion of AI-generated deepfake content in US election
- ➔
Version 0.17 (2024-03-06 16:36:31.040000)
updates: Highlights concerns raised by former FBI director Christopher Wray
- ➔
Version 0.16 (2024-03-05 23:08:00.270000)
updates: Discussion on the need for regulations and safeguards to prevent the misuse of AI in political campaigns
- ➔
Version 0.15 (2024-03-05 23:06:09.435000)
updates: Added information about the fake Biden robocall and concerns over A.I. deepfake technology in elections
- ➔
Version 0.14 (2024-03-04 21:20:29.471000)
updates: Inclusion of information about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s AI chatbot and its controversial views on vaccine safety
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.13 (2024-02-28 03:32:46.407000)
updates: The political consultant behind the robocall claims he was promoting need for AI rules
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.12 (2024-02-23 23:44:25.240000)
updates: Reveals the identity of the magician behind the AI robocall
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.11 (2024-02-23 23:42:30.699000)
updates: The addition of information about a magician being hired to use AI to imitate President Biden's voice in New Hampshire AI robocalls
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.1 (2024-02-23 23:41:00.249000)
updates: Magician hired to use AI to imitate President Biden's voice in New Hampshire AI robocalls
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.09 (2024-02-23 23:38:36.176000)
updates: Added information about the magician hired for AI robocalls
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.08 (2024-02-23 23:38:15.996000)
updates: Inclusion of information about a magician hired to use AI to imitate President Biden's voice in New Hampshire AI robocalls
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.07 (2024-01-24 03:04:51.247000)
updates: OpenAI suspends the developer of the Dean.bot AI bot
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.06 (2024-01-20 01:33:41.619000)
updates: Silicon Valley donors support Phillips in New Hampshire Democratic primary
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.05 (2024-01-20 01:32:09.250000)
updates: Controversy over removal of DEI language from campaign platform
- ➔
Version 0.04 (2024-01-18 18:52:15.867000)
updates: Expanded details of the campaign event and discussion on AI
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.03 (2024-01-18 17:42:39.325000)
updates: Campaign event with Andrew Yang in Manchester, NH
- ➔
Version 0.02 (2023-12-03 10:49:19.199000)
updates: New information about Dean Phillips' primary challenge against Joe Biden
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.01 (2023-12-01 11:42:25.706000)
updates: Added information about Dean Phillips' primary challenge to Biden
- ➔