[Tree] FCC's stance on Section 230 and Big Tech regulation
Version 0.18 (2024-11-24 18:37:23.864000)
updates: Carr emphasizes Section 230 and plans for Big Tech scrutiny
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.17 (2024-11-19 15:45:26.570000)
updates: Carr's regulatory focus and alignment with Trump
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.16 (2024-11-18 06:41:38.848000)
updates: Carr's appointment signals potential regulatory shifts
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.15 (2024-11-05 01:17:38.839000)
updates: Republican victory could alter net neutrality and broadband access
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.14 (2024-05-06 07:27:56.886000)
updates: Reinstatement of net neutrality rules by the FCC
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.13 (2024-04-26 08:01:41.131000)
updates: FCC votes to restore net neutrality rules, FTC also votes to restore rules
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.1 (2024-04-26 00:54:13.678000)
updates: The decision to restore net neutrality is seen as a victory for consumer privacy and democracy, returning control of the Internet to the American people.
- ➔
Version 0.06 (2024-04-26 00:53:16.148000)
updates: FCC votes to restore net neutrality regulations
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.04 (2024-04-26 00:52:50.144000)
updates: US regulators have reinstated net neutrality rules
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.02 (2024-04-12 11:41:25.830000)
updates: The FCC seeks to reinstate net neutrality as a national standard for broadband reliability, security, and consumer protection. The Brookings Institution argues that AI makes the fight for net neutrality even more important, as it ensures the free flow of data and collaboration for AI research. The absence of net neutrality could stifle competition, slow down innovation in AI, and impact access to AI-powered applications and services. This is the seventh time the FCC has addressed net neutrality in the past 20 years.
- ➔