[Tree] Impact of Trump on global cooperation and challenges

Version 0.12 (2024-11-15 08:43:28.843000)

updates: Focus on 'Trump-proofing' distracts from urgent issues

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.11 (2024-11-04 15:42:02.173000)

updates: Biden's withdrawal impacts US global leadership and trade

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.1 (2024-08-01 03:58:52.801000)

updates: President Biden's withdrawal from the presidential race and its impact on America's global standing

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.09 (2024-07-30 23:11:36.338000)

updates: President Biden's withdrawal from the presidential race raises concerns about America's position in the global economy

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.08 (2024-07-22 10:58:46.749000)

updates: Bill Ackman warns of exploitation of US weakness amid political chaos surrounding Biden's withdrawal

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.07 (2024-07-17 13:03:37.913000)

updates: Information about concerns over US retreat from African trade allies

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.06 (2024-07-17 10:58:02.746000)

updates: Democratic views on tech, trade, and globalization

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.05 (2024-07-12 01:55:46.611000)

updates: Information about the risks posed by US trade policy to the global economy and New Zealand exports

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.04 (2024-06-29 11:54:03.317000)

updates: Information about the axing of trade posts in British consulates in the US and the impact on state-level trade deals and British business leaders

  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.03 (2023-12-26 12:01:45.715000)

updates: Biden's decision to indefinitely shelve a trade deal with Britain undermines efforts to present a united front against China

  • ➔
Version 0.02 (2023-12-14 02:54:23.286000)

updates: The article provides additional information on the Biden administration's decision to withdraw support for digital trade provisions in the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework (IPEF), the concerns of U.S. business groups, the pressure from progressive Democratic lawmakers, and the impact of the U.S.'s retreat on the IPEF. It also highlights the stalled negotiations on the trade pillar of the IPEF and the implications for U.S. leadership and influence in the Indo-Pacific. Additionally, the article discusses the US' military aid to Taiwan, India's security concerns, and the challenges posed by China's economic clout. Finally, it mentions the Biden administration's shift towards nativist protectionism and the influence of Democrats in Congress on trade policies [e8814b95].

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.01 (2023-12-07 01:42:43.719000)

updates: US decision to not proceed with the trade pillar of the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework (IPEF) is seen as disappointing news for Asian member-states. The US' military aid to Taiwan highlights the insecurity caused by China in East Asia. The US needs to be engaged economically with Asia to maintain its military strength. The resumption of military dialogue between China and the US will not affect India, as they are already strengthening their military ties. India's security priority is its immediate Indian Ocean neighborhood, but it faces Chinese economic and military competition. The shelving of the IPEF trade pillar signals that the US has no economic agenda for Asia and no strategy to counter China's economic clout. India would have benefited from being part of a strong US-led IPEF trade program. India must tread carefully as it is being challenged by China and faces difficulties in attracting investment compared to China. China continues to challenge America's Asian primacy and presents its political system as the path for development. India will continue to engage with the US to counter China's aggression and promote a free and open Indo-Pacific.

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.0 (2023-11-20 07:24:16.688000)

updates:

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔