[Tree] Supreme Court rulings and Murthy case on censorship and free speech online
Version 0.64 (2024-07-05 11:22:55.967000)
updates: Incorporated analysis of the Murthy case on government censorship
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.63 (2024-07-04 23:21:01.446000)
updates: Supreme Court rulings raise concerns about censorship and free speech online
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.62 (2024-07-04 19:22:49.361000)
updates: Supreme Court's decision in Murthy v. Missouri case
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.61 (2024-07-02 12:23:00.210000)
updates: Supreme Court sends Texas social media law back to lower court
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.6 (2024-07-02 09:54:45.300000)
updates: The US Supreme Court declined to make a decision on the legality of Republican-backed laws in Florida and Texas that aim to restrict the power of social media companies to curb objectionable content
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.59 (2024-07-02 04:15:35.671000)
updates: A federal judge blocks Mississippi law restricting children’s social media use
- ➔
Version 0.58 (2024-07-01 16:56:28.036000)
updates: Supreme Court declines to rule on state laws restricting social media content moderation
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.57 (2024-07-01 15:57:43.750000)
updates: Supreme Court throws out rulings on state laws regulating social media
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.56 (2024-06-30 17:54:35.139000)
updates: Includes information on the ongoing battle for online free speech
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.55 (2024-06-26 16:57:30.073000)
updates: Supreme Court upholds government's ability to flag false or harmful posts on social media
- ➔
Version 0.54 (2024-06-26 14:38:49.508000)
updates: Updated information on the Supreme Court ruling and its implications
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.53 (2024-06-26 14:37:51.703000)
updates: Supreme Court ruling on federal government's ability to pressure social media companies to censor speech
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.52 (2024-06-26 14:37:32.054000)
updates: Supreme Court dismisses lawsuit alleging social media censorship by Biden administration
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.51 (2024-06-26 14:37:16.764000)
updates: Supreme Court ruling on social-media censorship
- ➔
Version 0.5 (2024-06-26 14:37:04.719000)
updates: Supreme Court rules in favor of Biden administration
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.49 (2024-06-26 14:36:50.179000)
updates: Supreme Court rejects suit alleging federal government bullied social media into censoring content
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.48 (2024-06-26 14:36:32.982000)
updates: The Supreme Court rules in favor of Biden administration in a dispute over social media censorship. Justices overturn lower court rulings that favored Republican-led states. Justices Alito, Thomas, and Gorsuch dissent.
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.47 (2024-06-26 14:36:18.696000)
updates: Supreme Court rules in favor of Biden administration
- ➔
Version 0.46 (2024-06-12 18:55:21.496000)
updates: Updates on the pending Supreme Court decision and a new lawsuit challenging Mississippi's age verification law
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.45 (2024-06-09 08:00:24.045000)
updates: Tech industry group files lawsuit challenging Mississippi website age verification law
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.44 (2024-06-03 02:09:39.357000)
updates: First Amendment lawsuit alleging State Department's role in censoring conservatives
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.43 (2024-05-29 23:12:04.606000)
updates: New information about MRC VP Dan Schneider's testimony on Big Tech censorship and the Texas Senate Committee authorizing subpoenas against Big Tech companies
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.42 (2024-05-02 02:28:00.043000)
updates: Lawsuit challenges Section 230 protections for social media platforms
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.41 (2024-04-12 22:25:44.797000)
updates: Pro-censorship advocate calls for removal of Section 230 protections
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.4 (2024-04-07 23:24:11.761000)
updates: New details about the arguments presented in the Supreme Court hearing
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.39 (2024-03-28 11:41:39.290000)
updates: Supreme Court compares social media to print media in Murthy v. Missouri case
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.38 (2024-03-26 17:16:49.140000)
updates: Accusations of Biden administration undermining democracy
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.37 (2024-03-23 21:54:12.348000)
updates: Bill Maher criticizes government censorship of COVID-19 opinions
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.36 (2024-03-23 04:57:00.306000)
updates: Incorporated analysis of the case and opinions on First Amendment
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.35 (2024-03-22 12:12:02.365000)
updates: New information on Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's views and criticism of her
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.34 (2024-03-22 00:48:07.692000)
updates: Supreme Court case raises concerns about government coercion and censorship policies
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.33 (2024-03-21 08:57:04.489000)
updates: Inclusion of an opinion article criticizing government actions
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.32 (2024-03-20 21:33:22.525000)
updates: Includes Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's views on the First Amendment
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.31 (2024-03-20 21:32:32.670000)
updates: Supreme Court hearing begins for Missouri vs Murthy case
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.3 (2024-03-20 05:22:34.040000)
updates: Inclusion of criticism of Justice Jackson's First Amendment remarks
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.29 (2024-03-20 05:22:18.707000)
updates: New information about the case and concerns expressed by Justices Kavanaugh and Kagan
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.28 (2024-03-19 06:21:17.380000)
updates: Supreme Court justices express concerns about potential censorship of articles in major newspapers
- ➔
Version 0.27 (2024-03-19 06:21:01.992000)
updates: Supreme Court skepticism, lower court ruling put on hold, conservative advocates' win
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.26 (2024-03-18 19:25:09.564000)
updates: Supreme Court skepticism in curbing government contact with social media firms
- ➔
Version 0.25 (2024-03-18 15:19:01.573000)
updates: Details about the lower court ruling and its impact on government officials and agencies
- ➔
Version 0.24 (2024-03-17 12:26:02.554000)
updates: The article provides additional information about politicians influencing social media decisions and the Supreme Court case Murthy v. Missouri
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.23 (2024-03-16 22:22:44.621000)
updates: Supreme Court unanimously rules that public officials can be sued for blocking critics on social media
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.22 (2024-03-16 00:15:35.097000)
updates: The Supreme Court will hear the case known as Murthy v. Missouri, also referred to as Missouri vs. Biden, which alleges government censorship of social media and violations of free speech rights. Senator Eric Schmitt claims that the lower court judge found viewpoint discrimination primarily targeting conservatives. Tens of thousands of pages of emails and text messages have been uncovered, revealing high-ranking government officials pressuring social media giants to censor speech. The case raises questions about the government's actions and whether they used the power of the federal government to force social media giants to do things they are not legally allowed to do [f4f114f6].
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.21 (2024-03-16 00:14:02.316000)
updates: Inclusion of a separate ruling on public officials' social media censoring habits
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.2 (2024-03-16 00:13:43.028000)
updates: The case involves allegations of government censorship and violations of free speech rights
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.19 (2024-03-16 00:13:23.752000)
updates: Supreme Court to hear case alleging government censorship of social media
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.18 (2024-03-15 22:25:42.745000)
updates: Supreme Court issues guidelines on First Amendment and social media
- ➔
Version 0.17 (2024-03-12 21:45:44.403000)
updates: Supreme Court docket reflects era of polarization, Amy Coney Barrett's remarks on finding compromise, mention of the upcoming Supreme Court case Murthy v. Missouri
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.16 (2024-03-04 05:32:50.032000)
updates: Incorporated information about the Supreme Court case Murthy v. Missouri and its potential impact on free speech and government censorship. Added details about First Liberty's involvement in the Supreme Court cases and their victories for religious freedom. Mentioned Hulu's reversal of a decision to approve a church ad and Alaska Airlines' wrongful termination of flight attendants based on religious beliefs.
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.15 (2024-03-01 16:51:33.894000)
updates: Integration of new information about the upcoming Supreme Court case on government forcing private companies to censor users
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.14 (2024-03-01 16:48:07.276000)
updates: Updates on First Liberty's involvement in Supreme Court cases and religious freedom victories
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.13 (2024-02-28 15:45:51.563000)
updates: Information about laws in Florida and Texas, and additional details on the Supreme Court cases
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.12 (2024-02-28 15:45:00.361000)
updates: The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression urges Florida Governor Ron DeSantis to veto a social media censorship bill
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.11 (2024-02-27 23:02:57.506000)
updates: Supreme Court justices raise concerns about Florida law; Arguments from Texas Solicitor General and Paul Clement
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.1 (2024-02-27 09:14:54.079000)
updates: Integration of new information about the case's implications and parties involved
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.09 (2024-02-27 04:54:42.459000)
updates: Integration of surprising legal ideology in the digital age
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.08 (2024-02-26 17:48:09.513000)
updates: Incorporated information about the specific cases and the Media Research Center's documentation of censorship cases by Big Tech companies
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.07 (2024-02-26 17:47:55.629000)
updates: Supreme Court hearing details, Biden administration's involvement
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.06 (2024-02-26 17:47:35.336000)
updates: Supreme Court hearing details, concerns raised by justices
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.05 (2024-02-26 17:47:07.939000)
updates: Florida Attorney General defends Florida's social media law
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.04 (2024-02-26 17:46:27.164000)
updates: Supreme Court hearing arguments, concerns about Florida law
- ➔
Version 0.03 (2024-02-24 20:22:33.544000)
updates: The Supreme Court will hear two additional cases on state-level rulings on censorship of online speech
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.02 (2023-12-02 21:21:18.394000)
updates: Supreme Court to hear cases on content moderation and government regulation
- ➔
Version 0.01 (2023-12-01 03:28:49.792000)
updates: New information on the legal challenges to social media laws in Texas and Florida
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔