[Tree] Economic impact of electric vehicle transition

Version 0.3 (2024-11-02 11:41:49.182000)

updates: Incorporated new data on EV economic effects

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.29 (2024-10-07 12:34:23.503000)

updates: New study evaluates EV subsidies' effectiveness and costs

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.28 (2024-09-28 16:42:12.492000)

updates: Automakers retreat from EV plans amid profitability concerns

  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.27 (2024-08-01 12:02:37.741000)

updates: New Jersey joins twelve other states in banning gas-powered cars

  • ➔
Version 0.26 (2024-07-02 22:58:15.099000)

updates: Inclusion of concerns raised by Idaho Congressman Russ Fulcher

  • ➔
Version 0.25 (2024-06-19 12:57:33.442000)

updates: Incorporated concerns raised by Montana State Senator Barry Usher over the impact of the EV mandate on Montana's energy industry and economy

  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.24 (2024-06-16 03:53:41.710000)

updates: Introduces criticism of Biden's EV mandate from Congressman Dan Meuser

  • ➔
Version 0.23 (2024-06-14 05:56:40.978000)

updates: Largest US oil trade group joins lawsuit to block Biden's EV push

  • ➔
Version 0.22 (2024-06-13 14:59:38.351000)

updates: Oil and Corn industries unite to challenge Biden's car standards

  • ➔
Version 0.21 (2024-06-11 23:55:52.865000)

updates: The article "Biden’s Grand Plan To Hand China More Manufacturing Jobs" raises concerns about Joe Biden's plan to offshore more of America's manufacturing jobs to China through massive tax credits for electric vehicles (EVs). The law, intended to support U.S.-made EVs, has a loophole that allows the import of EV parts from China. This loophole has led to an increase in leased EVs to take advantage of the pro-Chinese Communist Party loophole. Some Democrats, such as Sens. Sherrod Brown and Joe Manchin, have criticized this executive rule-making and aim to block Chinese imports of EV parts. The Biden administration has approved over $1 trillion in subsidies for EV cars over the next 10 years, while also attempting to halt the production of conventional energy resources. These subsidies will be funded by American households and funneled to companies that prioritize unelected bureaucrats and the Chinese Communist Party. The article questions the administration's priorities and suggests that Bidenomics is focused on climate alarmism rather than American prosperity. The author argues for standing up to the government and retaining the right to determine the course of individual lives. [43dd6bef]

  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.2 (2024-06-02 20:57:13.181000)

updates: Republicans and Democrats clash over Biden's EV push as public opinion remains divided

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.19 (2024-06-02 15:54:43.446000)

updates: Includes Republican and Democratic perspectives on Biden's EV policy

  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.18 (2024-06-02 14:56:15.585000)

updates: Republican lawmakers target Biden's EV push as an election-year issue, Democrats take a more nuanced approach

  • ➔
Version 0.17 (2024-06-01 21:52:52.868000)

updates: Republican lawmakers targeting Biden's EV tax credits and EPA emissions rule, Automakers expressing support for key parts of new US EPA vehicle emissions rules, Rick Scott demanding federal action in the electric vehicle market, concerns about Department of Energy's petroleum equivalency factor for EVs, concerns about Zeekr and its ties to the Chinese government, supply chain and human rights abuses

  • ➔
Version 0.16 (2024-05-20 21:55:20.120000)

updates: Automakers express support for key parts of US EPA vehicle emissions rules

  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.15 (2024-05-13 13:56:13.189000)

updates: AFPM launches ad campaign to overturn Biden's gas car ban

  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.14 (2024-05-09 23:53:17.559000)

updates: Added information about Republican lawmakers targeting energy efficiency standards for home appliances

  • ➔
Version 0.13 (2024-05-09 17:56:04.069000)

updates: Integration of information about Biden's latest vehicle regulation and its impact on gas cars

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.12 (2024-05-07 14:54:54.750000)

updates: Republican lawmakers intensify efforts to dismantle Biden's climate agenda

  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.11 (2024-05-06 00:52:45.260000)

updates: Introduction of the 'ELITE' Vehicles Act to eliminate US EV tax credit

  • ➔
Version 0.1 (2024-04-06 14:18:10.615000)

updates: Support for carbon tax and job creation

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.09 (2024-03-24 12:21:28.579000)

updates: Europe's plan to introduce a carbon border tax

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.08 (2024-03-23 06:17:45.493000)

updates: Guest column urging readers to ask Rep. Zinke to vote against carbon tax resolution

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.07 (2024-03-22 11:22:44.098000)

updates: The House of Representatives passed a nonbinding resolution disapproving of a carbon tax

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.06 (2024-03-21 19:20:31.783000)

updates: Integration of information about carbon border adjustment bills in the EU and the US

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.05 (2024-03-05 13:26:04.258000)

updates: Inclusion of information about the struggle for carbon pricing in Congress

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.04 (2024-03-02 20:17:44.381000)

updates: The Waxman-Markey climate bill has passed in the House of Representatives, imposing a cap-and-trade program and significant economic challenges on Ohio.

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.03 (2024-02-09 20:15:27.285000)

updates: Integration of Delegate Zatezalo's opposition to carbon border tax

  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.02 (2024-02-07 12:16:34.543000)

updates: Senator Lummis's support for the PROVE IT Act and its potential benefits

  • ➔
Version 0.01 (2023-12-14 19:11:54.617000)

updates: Permitting reform bill introduced, power grid vulnerabilities, tax credits for clean energy production

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.0 (2023-12-05 07:49:51.105000)

updates:

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔