[Tree] Impact of potential Trump presidency on immigrant communities
Version 1.23 (2024-11-02 13:35:37.831000)
updates: Added insights from Washington agricultural communities
- ➔
Version 1.22 (2024-10-30 20:40:55.445000)
updates: New data on mixed-status families and economic impact
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 1.21 (2024-10-30 16:43:56.718000)
updates: New data on family separation and economic impact
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 1.2 (2024-10-30 12:35:56.143000)
updates: Added details on Latino family separation and economic impact
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 1.19 (2024-10-28 08:38:56.160000)
updates: Added recent estimates and expert opinions.
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 1.18 (2024-10-27 15:42:05.287000)
updates: Inclusion of Russell Prescott's views on deportation
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 1.17 (2024-10-27 11:38:49.798000)
updates: New report highlights risks to 5 million families
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 1.16 (2024-10-26 16:35:33.102000)
updates: Integration of legal challenges and human impact stories
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 1.15 (2024-10-26 13:48:33.601000)
updates: Incorporated Texas perspective on deportation issues
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 1.14 (2024-10-23 17:41:44.071000)
updates: Lichtman's critique and economic impact estimates added
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 1.13 (2024-10-23 13:40:30.769000)
updates: Added local impacts and job market concerns
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 1.12 (2024-10-18 12:53:06.320000)
updates: Added details on costs and social impacts
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 1.11 (2024-10-18 10:38:34.878000)
updates: Updated cost estimates and labor market impacts
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 1.1 (2024-10-18 01:45:18.041000)
updates: Updated cost estimates and job loss projections
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 1.09 (2024-10-16 15:38:40.769000)
updates: Added economic analysis and expert opinions
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 1.08 (2024-10-15 09:40:23.956000)
updates: Added details on food supply disruption and labor reliance
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 1.07 (2024-10-14 23:43:13.242000)
updates: Added details about 'Operation Aurora' and economic impact
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 1.06 (2024-10-09 12:42:46.779000)
updates: Added economic and humanitarian perspectives on deportation
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 1.05 (2024-10-09 01:36:25.043000)
updates: Trump's deportation plan and economic implications updated
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 1.04 (2024-10-07 17:37:20.004000)
updates: Added cost estimates and economic impacts of deportation
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 1.03 (2024-10-04 09:42:57.717000)
updates: Inclusion of new economic and political perspectives.
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 1.02 (2024-10-02 14:35:11.152000)
updates: Added economic costs of mass deportation.
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 1.01 (2024-09-30 08:37:34.439000)
updates: Integration of new economic analysis and expert opinions
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 1.0 (2024-09-30 02:33:47.652000)
updates: Added analysis of economic impact and party dynamics
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.99 (2024-09-29 17:49:47.378000)
updates: Updated immigrant population statistics and partisan views
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.98 (2024-09-28 11:38:17.329000)
updates: Updated figures on undocumented immigrants and economic impact
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.97 (2024-09-27 11:38:49.295000)
updates: Incorporated Project 2025 details and human cost analysis
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.96 (2024-09-27 06:40:56.133000)
updates: Added historical context and political analysis
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.95 (2024-09-26 23:38:24.647000)
updates: New analysis on Trump's economic impact and inflation
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.94 (2024-09-26 17:36:38.896000)
updates: New study highlights potential GDP decrease and inflation
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.93 (2024-09-26 09:43:09.867000)
updates: Study reveals potential job losses and inflation spikes
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.92 (2024-09-25 15:42:10.391000)
updates: Added economic impact and societal concerns of Trump's policies
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.91 (2024-09-24 05:36:29.312000)
updates: Trump's deportation plans vs. labor shortages highlighted
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.9 (2024-09-19 00:42:15.861000)
updates: Poll shows support for mass deportation; experts warn of challenges.
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.89 (2024-08-15 19:09:23.440000)
updates: The article from Newsweek challenges the claim that immigrants are stealing jobs from American citizens and provides data from the American Immigration Council to support this argument.
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.88 (2024-07-26 09:02:57.309000)
updates: Op-ed and letter provide different perspectives on immigration
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.87 (2024-07-17 01:55:26.589000)
updates: Inclusion of a letter emphasizing the positive aspects of immigration
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.86 (2024-07-04 19:56:23.342000)
updates: The inclusion of an op-ed providing a different perspective on immigration
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.85 (2024-03-31 15:19:01.516000)
updates: Mixed views on contributions and risks of legal immigration
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.84 (2024-03-30 12:19:00.464000)
updates: Mixed views on contributions and risks of legal immigration
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.83 (2024-03-30 09:17:37.274000)
updates: Increased concern among Republicans about legal immigrants committing crimes
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.82 (2024-03-30 07:18:30.582000)
updates: Updated information on mixed views of legal immigration and the partisan divide
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.81 (2024-03-30 02:20:11.405000)
updates: US adults are less likely to view skilled workers as a major benefit of legal immigration
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.8 (2024-03-30 01:17:50.386000)
updates: Mixed views on contributions and risks of legal immigration
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.79 (2024-03-29 22:20:07.892000)
updates: Updated information on Americans' views on legal immigration and crime
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.78 (2024-03-29 21:17:49.427000)
updates: Americans' concerns about legal immigration and crime increase
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.77 (2024-03-29 20:21:33.195000)
updates: The poll highlights the complex views and opinions of Americans towards immigration
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.76 (2024-03-29 20:20:31.714000)
updates: Mixed views on immigration's impact on the economy and culture in the United States
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.75 (2024-03-29 20:17:34.156000)
updates: Updated information on Americans' views on immigration and the economy
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.74 (2024-03-29 19:20:15.187000)
updates: The new poll shows increased concern among Republicans about legal immigrants committing crimes in the U.S.
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.73 (2024-03-29 17:22:21.032000)
updates: Poll reveals increased concern among Republicans about legal immigrants committing crimes
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.72 (2024-03-29 16:22:05.091000)
updates: Poll reveals increased concern among Republicans about legal immigrants committing crimes
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.71 (2024-03-29 14:21:31.183000)
updates: The poll reveals increased concern among Republicans about legal immigrants committing crimes in the U.S. The perception of major benefits of legal immigration has decreased, while the perception of major risks has increased. There is a partisan divide on immigration issues, with Republicans more likely to see major risks and fewer benefits from immigrants, while Democrats are more likely to see benefits from immigration and believe it is important to the U.S.'s identity as a nation. There is bipartisan agreement on hiring more Border Patrol agents and immigration judges, but a partisan divide on reducing the number of immigrants seeking asylum and building a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border. The poll also found that U.S. adults, especially Republicans, are more likely to say that the country has been significantly changed by immigrants in the past five years [797d923b] [5dc74db5]
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.7 (2024-03-29 13:19:17.534000)
updates: Added information on perception of immigrants changing the country, bipartisan agreement on addressing immigration at the border
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.69 (2024-03-29 07:17:51.996000)
updates: Updated information on Americans' views on immigration and its impact on the economy and culture
- ➔
Version 0.68 (2024-03-29 06:17:29.830000)
updates: Fewer Americans believe immigrants contribute to the economy or enrich American culture
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.67 (2024-03-29 05:19:50.451000)
updates: Updated information on public opinion on immigration and its impact on the economy in the United States
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.66 (2024-03-29 05:17:52.017000)
updates: Updated information on public opinion on immigration and its impact on the economy in the United States
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.65 (2024-03-29 04:18:29.783000)
updates: Integration of new poll findings and comparison with previous poll
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.64 (2024-03-29 04:18:15.458000)
updates: Public opinion poll on immigration and the economy
- ➔
Version 0.63 (2024-03-12 12:17:20.932000)
updates: Illegal immigration's impact on the US economy and inflation
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.63 (2024-03-12 12:17:20.932000)
updates: Illegal immigration's impact on the US economy and inflation
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.63 (2024-03-12 12:17:20.932000)
updates: Illegal immigration's impact on the US economy and inflation
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.63 (2024-03-12 12:17:20.932000)
updates: Illegal immigration's impact on the US economy and inflation
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.63 (2024-03-12 12:17:20.932000)
updates: Illegal immigration's impact on the US economy and inflation
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.63 (2024-03-12 12:17:20.932000)
updates: Illegal immigration's impact on the US economy and inflation
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.63 (2024-03-12 12:17:20.932000)
updates: Illegal immigration's impact on the US economy and inflation
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.63 (2024-03-12 12:17:20.932000)
updates: Illegal immigration's impact on the US economy and inflation
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.63 (2024-03-12 12:17:20.932000)
updates: Illegal immigration's impact on the US economy and inflation
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.63 (2024-03-12 12:17:20.932000)
updates: Illegal immigration's impact on the US economy and inflation
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.63 (2024-03-12 12:17:20.932000)
updates: Illegal immigration's impact on the US economy and inflation
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.63 (2024-03-12 12:17:20.932000)
updates: Illegal immigration's impact on the US economy and inflation
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.63 (2024-03-12 12:17:20.932000)
updates: Illegal immigration's impact on the US economy and inflation
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.63 (2024-03-12 12:17:20.932000)
updates: Illegal immigration's impact on the US economy and inflation
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.63 (2024-03-12 12:17:20.932000)
updates: Illegal immigration's impact on the US economy and inflation
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.63 (2024-03-12 12:17:20.932000)
updates: Illegal immigration's impact on the US economy and inflation
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.63 (2024-03-12 12:17:20.932000)
updates: Illegal immigration's impact on the US economy and inflation
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.63 (2024-03-12 12:17:20.932000)
updates: Illegal immigration's impact on the US economy and inflation
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.63 (2024-03-12 12:17:20.932000)
updates: Illegal immigration's impact on the US economy and inflation
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.63 (2024-03-12 12:17:20.932000)
updates: Illegal immigration's impact on the US economy and inflation
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.63 (2024-03-12 12:17:20.932000)
updates: Illegal immigration's impact on the US economy and inflation
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.63 (2024-03-12 12:17:20.932000)
updates: Illegal immigration's impact on the US economy and inflation
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.63 (2024-03-12 12:17:20.932000)
updates: Illegal immigration's impact on the US economy and inflation
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.63 (2024-03-12 12:17:20.932000)
updates: Illegal immigration's impact on the US economy and inflation
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.63 (2024-03-12 12:17:20.932000)
updates: Illegal immigration's impact on the US economy and inflation
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.63 (2024-03-12 12:17:20.932000)
updates: Illegal immigration's impact on the US economy and inflation
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.63 (2024-03-12 12:17:20.932000)
updates: Illegal immigration's impact on the US economy and inflation
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.63 (2024-03-12 12:17:20.932000)
updates: Illegal immigration's impact on the US economy and inflation
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.62 (2024-03-07 16:18:46.385000)
updates: New information about higher immigration rates and their impact on employment growth
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.62 (2024-03-07 16:18:46.385000)
updates: New information about higher immigration rates and their impact on employment growth
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.62 (2024-03-07 16:18:46.385000)
updates: New information about higher immigration rates and their impact on employment growth
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.62 (2024-03-07 16:18:46.385000)
updates: New information about higher immigration rates and their impact on employment growth
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.62 (2024-03-07 16:18:46.385000)
updates: New information about higher immigration rates and their impact on employment growth
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.62 (2024-03-07 16:18:46.385000)
updates: New information about higher immigration rates and their impact on employment growth
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.62 (2024-03-07 16:18:46.385000)
updates: New information about higher immigration rates and their impact on employment growth
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.62 (2024-03-07 16:18:46.385000)
updates: New information about higher immigration rates and their impact on employment growth
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.62 (2024-03-07 16:18:46.385000)
updates: New information about higher immigration rates and their impact on employment growth
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.62 (2024-03-07 16:18:46.385000)
updates: New information about higher immigration rates and their impact on employment growth
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.61 (2024-03-03 11:18:55.356000)
updates: The article highlights the misrepresentation of the 'border crisis' by Republicans
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.61 (2024-03-03 11:18:55.356000)
updates: The article highlights the misrepresentation of the 'border crisis' by Republicans
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.6 (2024-03-03 09:17:03.806000)
updates: The article highlights the benefits of immigration on the US economy and job market, challenges the perception that immigrants take jobs from native-born workers, and criticizes political leaders for focusing on appearing tough on immigrants rather than highlighting the benefits of immigration. It also mentions New York City Mayor Adams's suggestion to cooperate with ICE and deport immigrants suspected of crimes before they are convicted, and suggests that he should focus on reducing waste in migrant services contracts and urging the Biden administration to provide assistance to arriving migrants.
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.59 (2024-03-02 15:18:01.319000)
updates: Updated information on the impact of immigration on the US economy and job market
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.59 (2024-03-02 15:18:01.319000)
updates: Updated information on the impact of immigration on the US economy and job market
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.58 (2024-03-01 17:20:18.593000)
updates: Updated information on the impact of immigration on the US economy and job market
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.58 (2024-03-01 17:20:18.593000)
updates: Updated information on the impact of immigration on the US economy and job market
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.58 (2024-03-01 17:20:18.593000)
updates: Updated information on the impact of immigration on the US economy and job market
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.57 (2024-02-29 23:16:53.537000)
updates: Updated information on the impact of immigration on the US economy and job market
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.57 (2024-02-29 23:16:53.537000)
updates: Updated information on the impact of immigration on the US economy and job market
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.57 (2024-02-29 23:16:53.537000)
updates: Updated information on the impact of immigration on the US economy and job market
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.56 (2024-02-29 21:17:11.898000)
updates: Updated information on the impact of immigration on the US economy and job market
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.55 (2024-02-29 15:23:21.808000)
updates: The article discusses the potential impact of sustained economic growth on US fiscal concerns, including the role of higher net immigration in boosting economic output and tax revenues. It also emphasizes the importance of the relationship between debt servicing interest costs and economic growth rates, as well as the need for the 'right' kind of growth to offset rising interest payments and maintain debt sustainability.
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.54 (2024-02-28 20:26:56.313000)
updates: The potential impact of sustained economic growth on US fiscal concerns
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.53 (2024-02-28 10:32:22.504000)
updates: New report on the role of immigration in the US economy's growth; Analysis shows half of labor market growth is due to foreign-born workers; Increased immigration not dragging down wages; Immigration a top concern for Americans; Biden administration blamed Republicans for border security issues
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.52 (2024-02-28 02:17:08.368000)
updates: Updated information on the economic impact of immigration and public perception of immigration policies
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.51 (2024-02-27 19:18:11.961000)
updates: Integration and policy formulation challenges, growing recognition of the symbiotic relationship between immigration and the economy
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.5 (2024-02-27 16:26:39.474000)
updates: The Washington Post claims illegal immigration is a reason for the 'roaring' economy as US food prices soar
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.49 (2024-02-27 11:17:12.834000)
updates: Added information about the impact of immigration on the job market
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.48 (2024-02-27 08:17:18.102000)
updates: The article provides specific projections on the economic impact of increased immigration
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.47 (2024-02-24 11:23:23.733000)
updates: The article highlights the economic and cultural benefits of immigration and urges Congress to embrace it as a strength. It emphasizes the negative impact of limiting immigration and the potential economic loss of $7 trillion. It also criticizes detention centers, deportations, and walls as inhumane and deadly. The article proposes opening up pathways to legalization and citizenship and addressing the root causes of migration as a real solution to immigration. It concludes by expressing confidence in Congress's ability to make progress on immigration [2721bd41].
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.46 (2024-02-23 10:18:48.377000)
updates: The recent boost in immigration is projected to add $7 trillion to the U.S. economy over the next decade. The surge in immigration that began in 2022 is expected to persist for several years and is estimated to lead to better economic growth. The CBO predicts that from 2023 to 2034, GDP will be greater by about $7 trillion and revenues will be greater by about $1 trillion than they would have been otherwise. The CBO's projections are supported by other observers who have highlighted the benefits of the recent influx of foreign-born workers, including higher entrepreneurship rates and contributions to science, research, and innovation. An analysis by nonpartisan congressional economists shows that the U.S. economy and Social Security depend on a growing immigrant workforce. The CBO predicts that the U.S. labor force will grow by an additional 5.2 million workers, primarily due to increased immigration, which will contribute 2% to the country's Gross Domestic Product. Immigrant workers are expected to add $7 trillion to the U.S. economy and $1 trillion in federal tax revenue within the next decade. Furthermore, new immigrants will prevent the U.S. population from shrinking, and they will be the source of all U.S. population growth by 2042. The CBO's report highlights the dependence of the U.S. economy and national budget on immigrant workers, including both legal and illegal immigrants. The report emphasizes that the growth of the U.S. labor force relies on immigrants and warns that the U.S. population will start shrinking in 2042 without the expected increase in immigrant workers. The Social Security system, which is facing a crisis due to more Americans retiring and living longer, could be saved by immigration. Undocumented immigrants and those with legal status contribute billions of dollars each year to the Social Security system through payroll taxes. Increasing immigration would help extend the solvency of the Social Security system.
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.45 (2024-02-20 14:19:26.750000)
updates: The surge in immigration is projected to add $7 trillion to the U.S. economy over the next decade
- ➔
Version 0.44 (2024-02-19 07:15:54.732000)
updates: Integration of new information about the impact of economic gloominess on the immigration debate
- ➔
Version 0.43 (2024-02-09 04:16:00.473000)
updates: New information about the decline in life satisfaction and its connection to Biden's economy
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.43 (2024-02-09 04:16:00.473000)
updates: New information about the decline in life satisfaction and its connection to Biden's economy
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.42 (2024-02-08 18:17:44.595000)
updates: New information on public sentiment and Biden's approval rating
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.41 (2024-02-08 00:17:53.339000)
updates: President Biden's concern about public sentiment despite positive economic indicators
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.4 (2024-02-07 23:13:21.731000)
updates: The article highlights the persistent pessimism among Americans despite positive economic indicators, which is impacting Biden's approval ratings. It also emphasizes the importance of consumer sentiment in shaping economic outcomes and the potential political implications of a shift in public sentiment. The article suggests that if the economy continues to show strength, it may help Biden win the election by dimming Trump's appeal.
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.39 (2024-02-06 14:11:47.296000)
updates: President Biden's questioning of negative public sentiment towards the US economy despite positive indicators
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.38 (2024-02-06 05:12:04.086000)
updates: Consumers' perception of the US economy improves, benefiting Biden's re-election chances
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.37 (2024-02-02 19:26:43.088000)
updates: Positive job growth and consumer sentiment boost Biden's standing
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.36 (2024-02-02 18:27:08.979000)
updates: Consumer sentiment improves, positive economic indicators
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.35 (2024-01-23 12:54:25.357000)
updates: Consumer sentiment improves, positive for Biden's reelection
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.34 (2024-01-22 12:53:20.401000)
updates: The media's coverage of the economy has shifted positively
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.33 (2024-01-19 23:42:01.240000)
updates: The University of Michigan's consumer survey reveals increased consumer sentiment in the U.S., benefiting President Biden's re-election prospects.
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.32 (2024-01-06 09:18:01.010000)
updates: The public's mood will play a significant role in the upcoming election in November.
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.31 (2024-01-06 09:16:00.443000)
updates: The new information provides additional insights into the negative public sentiment towards the American economy despite positive economic indicators. It highlights factors such as declining household earnings, rising grocery prices, and the lingering economic effects of the pandemic that contribute to the disconnect between economic performance and public sentiment. It also emphasizes the challenges faced by President Biden in changing public opinion and restoring confidence.
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.3 (2024-01-05 13:31:03.144000)
updates: The story has been updated to include additional information on public sentiment towards the American economy and President Biden's handling of the economy. The new information highlights the disconnect between positive economic indicators and public sentiment, as well as the factors contributing to the negative sentiment, such as inflation, pandemic effects, and financial strain on households. The story also mentions President Biden's upcoming visit to Wisconsin to address the challenge of improving public perception of the economy.
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.29 (2024-01-05 12:16:13.658000)
updates: New information about public sentiment and factors contributing to negative perception
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.28 (2023-12-25 20:59:12.944000)
updates: Integration of new information about consumer sentiment and Biden's approval rating
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.27 (2023-12-21 15:59:04.691000)
updates: The video from Peter Morici explains why Biden is losing support
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.26 (2023-12-20 04:01:15.419000)
updates: New information on public skepticism towards the economy
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.25 (2023-12-18 10:59:47.103000)
updates: Integration of new information about positive economic indicators
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.24 (2023-12-17 19:58:52.750000)
updates: The new information highlights the challenge Biden faces in the upcoming election due to negative public perception of the economy, despite positive economic indicators. It also emphasizes the role of Republicans in capitalizing on this dissatisfaction and the struggle of the White House to highlight economic progress. The article mentions the unprecedented gap between the strong economy and public perception, as well as the possible reasons for this gap, such as the impact of the pandemic, social media influence, and political beliefs. It also brings up the rising cost of living and the perception that the economy is not returning to pre-pandemic normal as challenges for Biden. The loss of pandemic aid and the argument about companies taking advantage of geopolitical events to raise prices are also mentioned. [334ade0e]
- ➔
Version 0.23 (2023-12-14 19:56:29.211000)
updates: New information about the economy and public perception
- ➔
Version 0.22 (2023-12-12 07:13:24.852000)
updates: Integration of new information about public perception of the US economy under Biden
- ➔
Version 0.21 (2023-12-12 06:05:16.463000)
updates: Integration of new information about Biden's economic challenges and public perception
- ➔
Version 0.2 (2023-12-12 02:26:04.179000)
updates: The negative perception of Biden's economic record is fueled by rising prices and public dissatisfaction with food and energy costs. Some Democrats are questioning whether Biden should be their presidential nominee. Biden's popularity is not as high as expected. People may be uninformed rather than misinformed. Biden's communication style may not resonate with today's media and the public. The challenge for Biden lies in winning the perceptions game and connecting everyday economic experiences with positive macro-economic trends. The divergence between the economy's health and public sentiment is unprecedented. Republicans are capitalizing on dissatisfaction to criticize Biden. The White House is struggling to highlight economic progress. The gap between data and public feeling may be due to the pandemic's impact, social media influence, and political biases. The loss of pandemic aid from the government could have left people feeling materially poorer. Some companies took advantage of geopolitical events to raise prices, but consumer fatigue with double-digit price increases has prompted companies to indicate future price increases closer to the historic average.
- ➔
Version 0.19 (2023-12-12 01:58:02.432000)
updates: The negative perception of Biden's economic record is fueled by rising prices and public dissatisfaction with food and energy costs. Some Democrats are questioning whether Biden should be their presidential nominee. Biden's popularity is not as high as expected. People may be uninformed rather than misinformed, and Biden's communication style may not resonate with today's media and the public. The challenge for Biden lies in winning the perceptions game and connecting everyday economic experiences with positive macro-economic trends. The divergence between the economy's health and public sentiment is unprecedented. Republicans are capitalizing on public dissatisfaction to criticize Biden. The White House is struggling to highlight economic progress. Experts suggest that the gap between data and public feeling may be due to the pandemic's impact, social media influence, and political biases. It may also take time for people to adjust to a slowing rate of inflation. The loss of pandemic aid from the government could have left people feeling materially poorer. Some companies took advantage of geopolitical events to raise prices, but consumer fatigue with double-digit price increases has prompted companies to indicate future price increases closer to the historic average. Biden's argument against price increases does not apply to current business practices.
- ➔
Version 0.18 (2023-12-11 23:40:08.780000)
updates: Integration of new information about public sentiment towards the economy
- ➔
Version 0.17 (2023-12-11 20:40:21.103000)
updates: Integration of new information about public perception of the economy
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.16 (2023-12-11 19:41:32.399000)
updates: Negative public sentiment towards Biden's economic policies
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.15 (2023-12-11 19:40:39.508000)
updates: Negative public perception despite strong economic indicators
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.14 (2023-12-11 17:40:42.273000)
updates: Integration of new information about public sentiment and Biden's messaging
- ➔
Version 0.13 (2023-12-11 16:43:18.701000)
updates: Integration of new information about public perception of Biden's economic policies
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.12 (2023-12-11 16:39:44.633000)
updates: Updated information on public perception of Biden's economic policies
- ➔
Version 0.11 (2023-12-11 14:44:43.716000)
updates: The article highlights the negative perception of Biden's economic policies despite positive economic indicators. It also mentions the success of the US economy under Biden's leadership but notes that his popularity is not as high as expected. The challenges Biden faces in connecting with voters on the economy are emphasized, along with the impact of rising prices and public dissatisfaction. The article suggests that people may be uninformed rather than misinformed, and that Biden's communication style may not resonate with today's media and the public. The gap between the economy's health and public perception is highlighted as a potential factor that could impact Biden's chances of securing a second term. The article also mentions the Biden administration's spending on post-Covid relief and its potential contribution to rising prices. The loss of government aid and sustained economic pain for many voters are also discussed. The White House's struggle to highlight economic progress and the gap between economic data and public sentiment are mentioned as challenges. The article concludes by mentioning the White House's efforts to build confidence in Biden's economic leadership and the potential improvement in sentiment as inflation recedes and the effects of pandemic aid diminish.
- ➔
Version 0.1 (2023-12-11 14:40:33.286000)
updates: Integration of new information about public sentiment and Biden's economic policies
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.09 (2023-12-11 14:04:02.234000)
updates: The article highlights the disconnect between economic data and public perception, suggesting that factors like inflation, rising prices, and supply chain issues contribute to the negative sentiment. It also mentions the potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and ongoing political polarization on people's perception of the economy.
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.08 (2023-12-11 12:48:36.118000)
updates: Integration of new information about public perception and Biden's economic leadership
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.07 (2023-12-11 11:47:57.338000)
updates: Integration of new information about public sentiment and Biden's messaging
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.06 (2023-12-11 10:47:02.993000)
updates: Integration of additional information about public perception of Biden's economic policies
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.05 (2023-12-11 08:20:54.543000)
updates: The article provides additional context on Biden's economic policies and their impact on public perception
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.04 (2023-12-11 06:53:33.284000)
updates: Integration of additional information about Biden's approval rating, financial pain among households, and the impact of Biden's economic policies on voters
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.03 (2023-12-11 06:51:29.937000)
updates: Integration of new information about public perception and challenges faced by Biden
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.02 (2023-12-11 05:52:48.042000)
updates: Integration of new information about public sentiment and economic progress
- ➔
Version 0.01 (2023-12-11 05:50:18.745000)
updates: Integration of new information about public perception and its impact on Biden's chances of re-election
- ➔