[Tree] Internet Archive copyright case and digital lending practices
Version 0.82 (2024-09-05 12:47:15.046000)
updates: Internet Archive loses appeal in major copyright case
- ➔
Version 0.81 (2024-05-08 18:07:47.972000)
updates: Microsoft and Google appeal Delhi HC order on NCII removal
- ➔
Version 0.8 (2024-05-04 02:53:38.257000)
updates: Judge prepares to render decision on Google antitrust case
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.79 (2024-05-03 14:45:04.504000)
updates: Closing arguments presented in the Google antitrust trial
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.78 (2024-05-03 07:15:28.298000)
updates: Updates on the closing arguments in the Google antitrust trial
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.77 (2024-05-02 09:53:35.721000)
updates: Updates on the DOJ's antitrust case against Google
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.76 (2024-05-01 04:25:34.506000)
updates: Integration of information about the DOJ's antitrust case against Google
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.75 (2024-04-17 22:20:23.634000)
updates: Inclusion of an opinion piece advocating for breaking up monopolies
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.74 (2024-03-31 11:49:45.587000)
updates: Examines the allegations, potential impact, and focus on super apps
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.73 (2024-03-26 14:58:47.785000)
updates: The U.S. Department of Justice lawsuit against Apple for suppressing super apps and cloud gaming services
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.72 (2024-03-26 13:22:30.169000)
updates: Analysts suggest potential changes to app store fees
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.71 (2024-03-25 22:20:41)
updates: Biden Administration joins antitrust efforts against Apple; investigating big grocers
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.7 (2024-03-25 18:21:49.588000)
updates: Consumer lawsuits accuse Apple of monopolistic practices
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.69 (2024-03-25 16:21:03.506000)
updates: Consumers join lawsuit against Apple, alleging monopolistic practices
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.68 (2024-03-25 01:46:46.755000)
updates: Added information about the social stigma aspect of the lawsuit
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.67 (2024-03-24 09:20:03.124000)
updates: US Department of Justice files lawsuit against Apple
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.66 (2024-03-24 08:34:28.862000)
updates: Inclusion of details from Arab Times Kuwait News
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.65 (2024-03-24 01:19:05.628000)
updates: Antitrust regulators targeting Apple and Google for potential break-up orders
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.64 (2024-03-23 20:04:59.768000)
updates: Apple critics argue that the company maintains a tight hold over the iPhone ecosystem through the App Store. They claim that Apple suppresses the development of "Super Apps" that could offer more functionality and convenience to users. Critics also argue that Apple's restrictive ecosystem creates customer loyalty and prevents users from switching to other operating systems. Additionally, Apple has been accused of blocking other developers from creating digital wallets on the iPhone and charging banks a fee for transactions made through Apple Pay. These practices have been seen as anti-competitive and detrimental to consumer choice [74d5d562].
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.63 (2024-03-23 19:18:04.639000)
updates: The lawsuit filed by the U.S. Department of Justice against Apple could potentially lead to a more consumer-friendly iPhone experience. In Europe, similar legal actions have resulted in user-friendly changes to Apple's popular smartphone. These changes include the switch to USB-C chargers, the creation of alternatives to Apple's App Store, allowing developers to avoid the 30% commission fee, and the ability for app developers to direct users to their own websites to buy items instead of using Apple's in-app purchasing system. Another change in Europe concerns default web browsers, where iPhone users now have the choice to switch when opening Safari in the latest Apple software update, iOS 17.4. If the Justice Department lawsuit is successful, similar changes could occur in the U.S., benefiting consumers and smaller companies whose apps work with the iPhone
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.62 (2024-03-23 07:20:30.473000)
updates: Updated information on the antitrust lawsuit against Apple
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.61 (2024-03-22 22:17:15.490000)
updates: Analysis of the lawsuit's writing style and focus on annoyances caused by Apple
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.61 (2024-03-22 22:17:15.490000)
updates: Analysis of the lawsuit's writing style and focus on annoyances caused by Apple
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.6 (2024-03-22 21:21:53.989000)
updates: Updated information on the Department of Justice's antitrust lawsuit against Apple
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.59 (2024-03-22 20:20:00.522000)
updates: Updates on the U.S. Department of Justice lawsuit against Apple
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.58 (2024-03-22 14:18:08.557000)
updates: Jonathan Kanter discusses the lawsuit against Apple
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.57 (2024-03-22 12:12:25.305000)
updates: Integration of additional details from I Get Talk
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.56 (2024-03-22 12:11:33.269000)
updates: The U.S. Department of Justice files antitrust lawsuit against Apple over iPhone monopoly
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.55 (2024-03-22 12:05:08.037000)
updates: The lawsuit details Apple's anticompetitive conduct and its impact on various industries. Analysts stand by Apple despite the lawsuit. The European Commission previously fined Apple for anticompetitive behavior [9a1ed61b].
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.54 (2024-03-22 12:03:41.503000)
updates: The Department of Justice files an antitrust lawsuit against Apple
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.53 (2024-03-22 12:03:18.556000)
updates: Analysts stand by Apple despite Department of Justice lawsuit
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.52 (2024-03-22 12:02:33.893000)
updates: Inclusion of new information from CBS News
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.51 (2024-03-22 09:20:45.966000)
updates: The US Justice Department and state Attorneys General are seeking relief to restore competition in these markets. Apple's stock dropped 3.6% following the news. The European Commission has previously fined Apple over $2 billion for abusing its dominant position in the distribution of music streaming apps.
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.5 (2024-03-22 08:18:00.703000)
updates: Inclusion of information about the lawsuit from The Economic Times
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.49 (2024-03-22 06:21:57.230000)
updates: Antitrust lawsuit filed against Apple, alleging illegal monopoly
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.48 (2024-03-22 01:27:03.416000)
updates: US Department of Justice files antitrust lawsuit against Apple
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.47 (2024-03-21 23:34:29.193000)
updates: The U.S. Department of Justice files an antitrust lawsuit against Apple, alleging illegal monopoly and violation of antitrust laws. Apple denies the allegations and warns of dangerous precedent.
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.46 (2024-03-21 23:34:03.492000)
updates: Inclusion of specific allegations and participation of California AG
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.45 (2024-03-21 23:29:49.925000)
updates: The US Department of Justice has filed an antitrust lawsuit against Apple, joined by 16 attorneys general, alleging that the tech giant has built a 'smartphone monopoly' at the expense of consumers, developers, and competitors. Apple has responded, stating that it disagrees with the lawsuit and will vigorously defend against it [f0a2dd25] [b97fcc78]. The lawsuit alleges that Apple has made it difficult for people to transfer their content to lower-price devices from other manufacturers and has used its power to lock in its own App ecosystem. The case is expected to last at least a year and possibly two [879831e2]. The lawsuit is part of the ongoing antitrust efforts against Big Tech giants and escalates the Biden administration's antitrust actions against Apple, Google, Meta, and Amazon [f0a2dd25].
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.44 (2024-03-21 23:29:35.931000)
updates: Apple to defend itself against US Justice Department's antitrust lawsuit
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.43 (2024-03-21 23:29:05.559000)
updates: Lawsuit details, Apple's response, market impact, and previous antitrust allegations
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.41 (2024-03-21 23:25:57.036000)
updates: Antitrust lawsuit filed by U.S. Department of Justice and 16 states
- ➔
Version 0.4 (2024-03-21 23:25:41.083000)
updates: New Jersey Attorney General Matt Platkin leads the lawsuit against Apple
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.39 (2024-03-21 23:21:07.822000)
updates: US Justice Department files antitrust lawsuit against Apple, alleging iPhone monopoly
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.38 (2024-03-21 22:19:07.381000)
updates: Inclusion of information about the US Justice Department's imminent antitrust lawsuit against Apple
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.37 (2024-03-21 21:06:44.402000)
updates: Yale scholar compares Apple case to Microsoft battle
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.36 (2024-03-21 19:20:11.157000)
updates: Evercore ISI maintains Outperform rating for Apple despite legal challenges
- ➔
Version 0.35 (2024-03-21 17:23:15.946000)
updates: The US Department of Justice files a lawsuit against Apple for alleged iPhone monopoly, accusing the company of exclusionary practices and imposing high costs on consumers. The lawsuit also accuses Apple of squashing the creation of Super Apps and making it hard for Apple users to interact easily with Android phone users.
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.34 (2024-03-21 17:21:41.030000)
updates: The US Justice Department and more than a dozen states have filed a landmark antitrust lawsuit against Apple, accusing the tech giant of illegally monopolizing the smartphone market. The lawsuit alleges that Apple has used its control over the iPhone to engage in illegal conduct, including restrictive app store terms, high fees, and a 'walled-garden' approach to its hardware and software. Critics have long claimed that Apple's practices harm competition and restrict innovation. One of the key allegations in the lawsuit is that Apple gives its own products preferential treatment, allowing them to access certain parts of its hardware that it restricts other companies from using. For example, iPhone customers can send high-quality photos and videos seamlessly to one another, while multimedia texts to Android phones are slower and of lower quality. The lawsuit claims that Apple's practices harm everything from text messaging to mobile payments. Another issue raised in the lawsuit is Apple's 30% commission on most sales through its app store. Critics argue that this commission is excessive and stifles competition. The lawsuit claims that Apple has used a complex web of contractual terms to maintain its monopoly power in the smartphone market and harm competition. The lawsuit, brought by 17 US states, also accuses Apple of making it difficult for consumers to switch away from Apple to cheaper smartphones and devices. It focuses on Apple's app store, which sets strict conditions on firms and developers seeking to reach the iPhone's 136 million US users. The lawsuit claims that Apple's practices make it hard for Apple users to interact with Android phone users and stifle the creation of Super Apps. Additionally, Apple is accused of forcing others to pay a fee for tap payments. Apple denies the charges and claims that if the suit is successful, it would set a dangerous precedent. Apple has responded to the lawsuit, denying the allegations and stating that it will vigorously defend itself. The company argues that its practices have led to a thriving app economy and that it faces significant competition in the smartphone market. Apple's defense is expected to focus on the benefits it provides to consumers and the investments it has made in developing and maintaining its ecosystem. This is not the first time that Apple has faced legal action for alleged antitrust violations. The company has previously been sued by the US Justice Department, but this is the first instance where it is accused of unlawfully maintaining its dominant position. Apple is also facing regulatory scrutiny in Europe, including a potential investigation under the Digital Markets Act and a fine of €1.8 billion for alleged anticompetitive practices. Non-compliance with EU regulations could result in significant penalties. The lawsuit against Apple is part of the US government's increased enforcement of antitrust statutes under President Joe Biden. The Justice Department is already engaged in antitrust battles against other major tech companies, including Google, Meta Platforms Inc., and Amazon.com Inc. The outcome of these cases could have far-reaching implications for the tech industry and the future of competition in the digital marketplace.
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.33 (2024-03-21 16:23:49.107000)
updates: The lawsuit accuses Apple of making it difficult for consumers to switch away from Apple to cheaper smartphones and devices, and focuses on Apple's app store practices. It also accuses Apple of stifling the creation of Super Apps and forcing others to pay a fee for tap payments. Apple denies the charges and claims that if the suit is successful, it would set a dangerous precedent.
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.32 (2024-03-21 15:27:54.278000)
updates: The US Justice Department files an antitrust lawsuit against Apple for alleged iPhone monopoly
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.31 (2024-03-21 15:24:00.275000)
updates: US Justice Department files antitrust lawsuit against Apple for alleged iPhone monopoly
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.3 (2024-03-21 15:22:43.833000)
updates: US Justice Department files antitrust lawsuit against Apple for smartphone monopoly
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.29 (2024-03-21 14:23:37.386000)
updates: US Department of Justice to sue Apple for alleged antitrust violations
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.28 (2024-03-21 06:56:33.348000)
updates: US Justice Department to sue Apple for alleged antitrust violations
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.27 (2024-03-21 06:21:20.680000)
updates: US Justice Department to sue Apple for alleged antitrust violations
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.26 (2024-03-21 02:22:51.883000)
updates: Inclusion of tech giants challenging Apple's App Store plans
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.25 (2024-03-18 04:20:07.753000)
updates: Google faces antitrust investigation in India over high fees charged to developers
- ➔
Version 0.24 (2024-03-04 19:21:52.692000)
updates: EU fine wipes $78bn off Apple's valuation, Spotify welcomes the penalty
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.23 (2024-03-04 19:18:30.307000)
updates: EU fines Apple for antitrust violations, broader regulatory crackdown on Big Tech
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.22 (2024-02-10 00:33:46.502000)
updates: Inclusion of information about hidden fees in app stores and proposed legislation to address the issue
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.21 (2024-01-18 03:51:27.121000)
updates: Apple allows alternative payment systems with fees and conditions
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.2 (2024-01-18 01:54:24.183000)
updates: Apple facing criticism for demanding a 27% cut of developer revenue
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.19 (2024-01-17 06:08:25.519000)
updates: Supreme Court denies Epic v. Apple case; Apple revises App Store rules
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.18 (2024-01-17 06:07:58.175000)
updates: Apple allows developers to link to outside payment methods
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.17 (2024-01-17 06:06:59.773000)
updates: Apple allows links to external websites, collects commission from apps with their own billing system, informs users about risks of leaving Apple ecosystem, allows iPhone app developers to email customers
- ➔
Version 0.16 (2024-01-16 17:38:31.500000)
updates: US Supreme Court rejects Epic Games' bid to challenge Apple
- ➔
Version 0.15 (2024-01-11 08:24:50.110000)
updates: Updates on Google's antitrust challenges and settlement, as well as the pending EU fine
- ➔
Version 0.14 (2023-12-30 22:20:37.484000)
updates: Google's settlement in antitrust lawsuit, dominance in search market, revenue, and privacy lawsuit settlement
- ➔
Version 0.13 (2023-12-19 15:59:26.634000)
updates: Google agrees to pay $700 million settlement, make changes to Play app store. Epic Games wins trial against Google over Play app store.
- ➔
Version 0.12 (2023-12-19 11:04:23.606000)
updates: Google agrees to pay $700 million in antitrust settlement with US consumers and states
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.11 (2023-12-19 09:00:36.663000)
updates: Google agrees to pay $700 million in antitrust settlement with US consumers and states
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.1 (2023-12-12 21:11:17.458000)
updates: Jury finds Google guilty of anti-competitive practices in the app market
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.09 (2023-12-12 07:37:44.260000)
updates: Epic Games wins trial against Google over Google Play
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.08 (2023-12-12 04:16:16.483000)
updates: Epic Games wins antitrust case against Google over app store practices
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.07 (2023-11-14 07:54:37.464000)
updates: Revealed details of Google and Apple's revenue-sharing agreement
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.05 (2023-10-31 04:27:02.392000)
updates: Expanded information on CEO's testimony and concerns about Safari browser
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.04 (2023-10-29 12:06:10.142000)
updates: Combined information about Google's payments and CEO's testimony
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.03 (2023-10-28 01:03:38.272000)
updates: The new narrative provides more details about the payment and its implications
- ➔
Version 0.02 (2023-10-26 10:03:29.210000)
updates: The original title was modified to better reflect the content
- ➔
Version 0.01 (2023-10-20 23:25:16.381000)
updates: Added information about major tech companies reporting quarterly earnings
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔