[Tree] Nancy Pelosi's criticism of Supreme Court ruling on immunity
Version 0.24 (2024-11-10 02:37:01.046000)
updates: Pelosi's recent comments on Supreme Court ruling added.
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.23 (2024-07-04 00:23:46.388000)
updates: Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity and fearmongering
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.22 (2024-07-04 00:21:51.906000)
updates: Discussion on Chief Justice Roberts' decision on presidential immunity and fearmongering
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.21 (2024-06-29 02:34:07.145000)
updates: Chief Justice Roberts announces final opinions of the term
- ➔
Version 0.2 (2024-06-27 07:21:32.587000)
updates: Chief Justice John Roberts upholds federal law on domestic violence and gun possession
- ➔
Version 0.19 (2024-06-20 15:32:20.677000)
updates: Supreme Court issues per curiam opinion in Gonzalez v. Trevino
- ➔
Version 0.18 (2024-06-19 21:36:10.204000)
updates: Incorporated Justice Alito's comments on the deep divide in the country and the decline of compromise in American politics
- ➔
Version 0.17 (2024-06-16 09:32:10.444000)
updates: Supreme Court justices secretly recorded, questions about Alito's impartiality, problems with electronic surveillance laws
- ➔
Version 0.16 (2024-06-15 16:55:58.411000)
updates: New information about Senate Judiciary Chair's statement on serving a subpoena to Samuel Alito
- ➔
Version 0.15 (2024-06-15 16:53:41.552000)
updates: Senate Democrats introduce 'ethics' bill targeting Supreme Court justices
- ➔
Version 0.14 (2024-06-12 01:10:53.618000)
updates: Senate Democrats introduce 'ethics' bill targeting Supreme Court justices
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.13 (2024-06-08 09:21:42.618000)
updates: Updates on upcoming Supreme Court rulings and ethics controversies
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.12 (2024-05-23 02:23:24.896000)
updates: Ethical concerns surrounding US courts and calls for reform
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.11 (2024-03-19 03:54:30.546000)
updates: In New York, the Committee on Judicial Ethics issued Opinion 23-83, which addresses the involvement of judges on a court-sponsored committee on racial equality in the courts. The opinion states that judges on the committee may publicly support an effort to rename a local geographic feature that currently bears a racially offensive name. However, they must not assume a leadership role in the effort or use judicial or court resources to file the name change application with federal authorities.
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.1 (2024-02-25 04:12:06.455000)
updates: South Dakota Supreme Court decision on conflict of interest, Supreme Court ethics code enacted, Clarence Thomas violation of federal laws
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.09 (2024-02-21 21:31:43.317000)
updates: Inclusion of incident involving a judge failing to disclose a prior political donation
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.08 (2023-12-31 12:02:08.468000)
updates: Supreme Court rulings and ethics scandals in 2023
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.07 (2023-11-19 07:00:17.792000)
updates: Updated information on South Dakota Supreme Court defining conflict of interest and Supreme Court enacting ethics code
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.06 (2023-11-19 06:58:33.168000)
updates: Updates on South Dakota Supreme Court's decision on conflict of interest
- ➔
Version 0.04 (2023-11-15 14:40:55.244000)
updates: Supreme Court adopts first code of ethics to address controversy and improve public trust
- ➔
Version 0.03 (2023-11-15 14:40:06.858000)
updates: The Supreme Court announces its first formal code of ethics for justices
- ➔
Version 0.02 (2023-11-15 14:32:23.969000)
updates: Incorporated recent article discussing the Supreme Court's ethics code and controversy
- ➔
- ➔
- ➔
Version 0.01 (2023-10-16 18:47:23.879000)
updates: Emphasizes the importance of the Supreme Court in protecting constitutional rights and preserving democratic norms
- ➔
- ➔