[Tree] Canada's potential trade response to US tariffs

Version 0.74 (2024-12-13 04:01:53.850000)

updates: Canada considers export taxes amid US tariff threats

  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.73 (2024-11-28 21:41:17.548000)

updates: Increased Canadian output amid tariff threats

  • ➔
Version 0.72 (2024-11-20 19:46:30.499000)

updates: New uranium resources and mining initiatives in the U.S.

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.71 (2024-11-20 11:48:23.471000)

updates: Added details on Atlantic Action II and market reactions

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.7 (2024-11-19 07:45:34.810000)

updates: Added details on export restrictions and market impact

  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.69 (2024-11-16 15:39:48.085000)

updates: Russia reduces uranium exports, impacting US energy security

  • ➔
Version 0.68 (2024-11-14 01:50:43.805000)

updates: Integration of Trump's energy policies and sanctions

  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.67 (2024-11-10 03:38:24.082000)

updates: Added insights on Arctic LNG project and U.S. sanctions

  • ➔
Version 0.66 (2024-10-31 14:52:42.654000)

updates: Added context on regulatory impact and Japan's concerns

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.65 (2024-10-29 18:39:10.898000)

updates: Added details on Pfluger's protest and energy group support

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.64 (2024-10-26 22:44:48.586000)

updates: Allegations of concealed study on LNG exports

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.63 (2024-08-03 00:14:52.526000)

updates: Inclusion of U.S. Rep. Jodey Arrington and over 50 members of Congress demanding the Biden-Harris administration to authorize LNG export permits

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.62 (2024-08-01 14:12:23.781000)

updates: Senator Bill Cassidy's criticism of the LNG export permit freeze

  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.61 (2024-07-16 13:54:41.219000)

updates: Integration of U.S. Senator Bill Cassidy's remarks on various topics

  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.6 (2024-07-09 13:58:55.336000)

updates: Former Energy Secretary Rick Perry criticizes Biden administration's energy policies

  • ➔
Version 0.59 (2024-07-08 15:00:27.274000)

updates: A federal judge in Louisiana has blocked the Biden administration's pause on LNG export permits. The judge ruled that the pause was 'completely without reason or logic' and contravened the Natural Gas Act. The court's decision has been hailed as a major victory by opponents of the LNG permitting pause.

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.58 (2024-07-07 09:01:20.468000)

updates: The article provides analysis on how energy policy would shift with a Trump win in November.

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.57 (2024-07-06 10:54:18.209000)

updates: The court's decision aligns with the argument that American natural gas is a win for climate, economy, and security. Switching from coal to natural gas has been the primary reason for the U.S.'s emissions reduction. American LNG is cleaner than coal used for energy in Europe and Asia. American LNG exports are also cheaper than the Russian alternative. Innovations in the fossil fuel industry, such as carbon capture and methane abatement, can make American natural gas less emissions-intensive. American LNG has been an economic boon, creating jobs and ensuring national and global energy security. Relying on Russia and Iran for energy puts the U.S. and its allies at risk. The court's decision to halt the ban on new LNG export permits is a step in the right direction for a clean energy future.

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.56 (2024-07-04 16:57:28.401000)

updates: The federal judge blocks the ban on LNG export permits

  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.55 (2024-07-02 11:56:40.625000)

updates: The federal judge blocks the ban on LNG permits

  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.54 (2024-07-02 06:56:40.546000)

updates: A federal judge in Louisiana has blocked President Biden’s pause on new LNG export capacity approvals. The pause, which was signed by President Biden in January, was challenged by 16 states in a lawsuit claiming that it would negatively impact the U.S. economy and interfere with gas supply to European allies. U.S. District Judge James Cain ruled that the government’s move was arbitrary, capricious, and unconstitutional, and violated the Natural Gas Act. The ruling is expected to alleviate tension in energy circles caused by federal government energy policies.

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.53 (2024-07-02 04:56:21.799000)

updates: Federal judge blocks Biden administration's pause on LNG permits

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.52 (2024-07-02 01:54:14.299000)

updates: Federal judge orders resumption of gas export permits

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.51 (2024-06-19 13:54:52.227000)

updates: House Republicans introduce resolution condemning Biden's LNG ban

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.5 (2024-06-14 19:53:35.301000)

updates: House Republicans renew push to overturn Biden's LNG pause

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.49 (2024-06-14 18:54:03.100000)

updates: House Republicans call for reversal of Biden's pause on LNG export approvals

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.48 (2024-06-02 20:56:19.197000)

updates: Senator Ted Cruz introduces Natural Gas Tax Repeal Act to eliminate Biden's new methane emissions tax

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.47 (2024-05-29 00:53:06.955000)

updates: Senator Ted Cruz introduces legislation to repeal Biden's Natural Gas Tax

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.46 (2024-05-28 19:52:56.041000)

updates: Senator Ted Cruz introduces legislation to repeal Biden's Natural Gas Tax

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.45 (2024-05-23 15:55:46.993000)

updates: Senate passes resolution blocking Biden rule on gas furnaces

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.44 (2024-05-22 03:52:09.103000)

updates: Inclusion of Senate resolution blocking Biden rule on gas furnaces

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.43 (2024-05-20 10:56:09.964000)

updates: Stricter pollution rules pose risk of delays for new US LNG export projects

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.42 (2024-05-17 16:56:38.307000)

updates: Inclusion of a lawsuit challenging the ban

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.41 (2024-04-08 22:18:08.214000)

updates: Incorporated opening remarks from House Energy and Commerce Energy, Climate, and Grid Security Subcommittee Chair Jeff Duncan at a hearing in Port Arthur, Texas, on Biden's LNG export ban

  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.4 (2024-03-29 07:20:03.908000)

updates: Texas House Speaker calls for committee to study impact of ban

  • ➔
Version 0.39 (2024-03-27 18:20:10.820000)

updates: Inclusion of Todd Staples' criticism of the LNG export ban and its impact on jobs and allies

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.38 (2024-03-22 18:24:09.281000)

updates: Inclusion of Texas Land Commissioner Dawn Buckingham's lawsuit against the Biden administration

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.37 (2024-03-22 16:18:30.870000)

updates: US states file lawsuit against Biden's ban on LNG exports

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.36 (2024-03-22 11:24:13.319000)

updates: Inclusion of information about the lawsuit filed by 16 US states

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.35 (2024-03-22 10:23:52.914000)

updates: The story now includes information about the lawsuit filed by sixteen US states challenging the LNG export ban, as well as additional details about the opposition to the ban and the reasons behind it.

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.34 (2024-03-21 23:17:15.464000)

updates: The US states have filed a lawsuit challenging the ban on LNG permits

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.33 (2024-03-21 22:19:46.989000)

updates: US states file lawsuit challenging LNG export ban

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.32 (2024-03-21 22:18:08.452000)

updates: Integration of the news about US states filing a lawsuit against the federal government over the LNG permit ban

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.31 (2024-03-21 12:17:05.991000)

updates: The story now includes additional details about the opposition to the LNG export ban from various business chambers and organizations.

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.3 (2024-03-21 10:20:36.564000)

updates: Business chambers express concerns about the moratorium

  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.29 (2024-03-19 18:17:42.369000)

updates: The poll results show overwhelming support for LNG exports and an all-of-the-above energy approach

  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.28 (2024-03-19 14:17:19.206000)

updates: The addition of a recent poll conducted by the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) showing overwhelming opposition to the LNG export pause and support for an all-of-the-above energy approach

  • ➔
Version 0.27 (2024-02-28 18:22:08.597000)

updates: Integration of new information about the impact on small businesses, US strategic interests, and legislative action by House Republicans

  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.26 (2024-02-28 11:20:07.233000)

updates: The op-ed provides a perspective from House Republicans on the impact of Biden's LNG export ban

  • ➔
Version 0.25 (2024-02-19 18:17:16.174000)

updates: Inclusion of Speaker Mike Johnson's statement on H.R. 7176

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.24 (2024-02-16 18:17:45.333000)

updates: Inclusion of U.S. Rep. Randy Weber's vote and statement

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.23 (2024-02-16 17:17:32.599000)

updates: The U.S. House of Representatives passes the Unlocking Our Domestic LNG Potential Act of 2024 with a bipartisan vote of 224-200, overturning the Biden administration's decision to pause LNG exports to non-free trade partners. The bill transfers the authority to approve export requests to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and repeals all restrictions on the import and export of natural gas by amending the Natural Gas Act. House Energy and Commerce Committee Chair Cathy McMorris Rodgers criticizes President Biden's ban on new permits for clean U.S. LNG exports, arguing that it puts the interests of radical environmentalists ahead of the best interests of the United States and its allies. Eight members of the U.S. upper house have requested a determination from the Government Accountability Office on whether the Department of Energy's decision to pause LNG exports falls under the Congressional Review Act.

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.22 (2024-02-16 15:20:05.882000)

updates: The U.S. House of Representatives passes the Unlocking Our Domestic LNG Potential Act of 2024 to reverse Biden's pause on LNG exports

  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.21 (2024-02-16 02:18:26.119000)

updates: The House passes bill to reverse Biden's pause on LNG exports

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.2 (2024-02-15 22:20:16.443000)

updates: The House passes a bill to reverse Biden's ban on LNG export terminals

  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.19 (2024-02-15 22:19:43.445000)

updates: The House has passed the bill to limit Biden's authority on LNG export permits

  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.18 (2024-02-15 20:19:38.069000)

updates: The House passes H.R. 7176 to reverse Biden's ban on LNG exports

  • ➔
Version 0.17 (2024-02-15 20:18:24.811000)

updates: House passes H.R. 7176 to reverse Biden's ban on LNG exports

  • ➔
Version 0.16 (2024-02-15 16:16:32.517000)

updates: House Republicans push for reversal of Biden's ban on LNG exports

  • ➔
Version 0.15 (2024-02-14 19:31:20.590000)

updates: House Republicans urge reversal of LNG export ban

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.14 (2024-02-14 02:48:33.694000)

updates: President Biden's decision to impose a moratorium on permits for liquefied natural gas (LNG) export terminals has drawn criticism and raised concerns about its impact on jobs, economic growth, and energy security in the United States. Congressman Tom Cole argues that the policy targets American-made energy and ignores the fact that natural gas is a critical component of productivity and sustainability. The Department of Energy's decision to suspend new permits for building LNG export terminals is part of President Biden's commitment to transitioning away from fossil fuels and fighting climate change. The debate around the regulation of residential gas boilers reflects the broader discussions and challenges surrounding the energy transition and the need to balance environmental goals with economic considerations.

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.13 (2024-02-13 16:21:08.785000)

updates: The story now includes information about Rinnai America Corporation's concerns over proposed regulations on gas water heaters.

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.13 (2024-02-13 16:21:08.785000)

updates: The story now includes information about Rinnai America Corporation's concerns over proposed regulations on gas water heaters.

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.12 (2024-02-12 23:23:31.926000)

updates: Mixed response to US push to regulate residential gas boilers

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.11 (2024-02-12 08:22:33.140000)

updates: The Biden administration introduces stricter standards for residential gas boilers

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.1 (2024-02-09 20:16:54.211000)

updates: Includes information on the temporary pause on LNG permits and the review of LNG projects by the Department of Energy

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.09 (2024-02-09 09:14:31.887000)

updates: New information about the short-term nature of the pause and its purpose to reassess economic and environmental benefits

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.08 (2024-02-08 21:16:20.065000)

updates: Incorporated Senator Kennedy's criticism of Biden's decision on LNG export approvals

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.07 (2024-02-07 21:19:17.874000)

updates: Incorporated criticism from Energy and Commerce Republicans

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.06 (2024-02-07 13:11:32.530000)

updates: Incorporated Bloomberg Opinion's criticism of Biden's LNG export halt

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.05 (2024-02-07 11:15:19.587000)

updates: The story now includes information about the Biden administration's decision to suspend new permits for LNG export terminals and the arguments from the petroleum industry and its politicians defending LNG. It also highlights the Chamber of Commerce for Southwest Louisiana's argument for LNG development and the economic survey showing the potential increase in energy costs for Americans. Additionally, it mentions polling indicating that Americans do not support fracking to send cheap gas to China. Lastly, it emphasizes Biden's commitment to transitioning away from fossil fuels [fa66bb45].

  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.04 (2024-02-07 00:11:41.840000)

updates: Senator Kennedy's condemnation of the Biden administration's decision to pause LNG exports

  • ➔
Version 0.03 (2024-02-05 19:13:34.748000)

updates: The Biden Administration's recent announcement of a broad pause on pending approvals for new liquified natural gas (LNG) exports

  • ➔
  • ➔
Version 0.02 (2024-02-03 16:11:38.233000)

updates: The Biden Administration's allocation of funds for new energy technologies and its ban on permits for LNG exports

  • ➔
Version 0.01 (2023-12-23 10:01:56.268000)

updates: Integration of the impact of climate change on the global economy and the potential shift in economic power

  • ➔
Version 0.0 (2023-11-10 13:26:00.172000)

updates:

  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔
  • ➔